Kansas Statutes Annotated
K.S.A. § 60-724 (2026)
Exceptions
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
KS-LEGkslegislature.org
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
60-724. Exceptions. No judgment shall be rendered in garnishment by reason of the garnishee:
(1) having drawn, accepted, made, endorsed, or guaranteed any negotiable bill, draft, note, or other security, or
(2) holding moneys on a claim not arising out of contract and not liquidated as to amount, or
(3) holding moneys or property exempt by law, or the proceeds therefrom.
History: L. 1963, ch. 303, 60-724; January 1, 1964.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11
cases, 1970–2019 · leading case: Geer v. Eby, 432 P.3d 1001 (Kan. 2019).
Geer v. Eby, 432 P.3d 1001 (Kan. 2019). “" K.S.A. 60-724(2). This court has interpreted this provision as intended to exclude garnishment of unliquidated tort claims.”
In Re Adcock, 264 B.R. 708 (D. Kan. 2000). “1992), where the court found that K.S.A. § 60-724(2) does not constitute an exemption within the meaning of 11 U.”
In Re Doughman, 263 B.R. 905 (Bankr. D. Kan. 1999). “1992), where the court found that K.S.A. § 60-724(2) does not constitute an exemption within the meaning of 11 U.”
Gilley Ex Rel. Gilley v. Farmer, 485 P.2d 1284 (Kan. 1971). “court found that (1) a judgment creditor has no right to proceed by garnishment against his judgment debtor’s liability insurer for a judgment exceeding the policy limits on the grounds of negligence, bad faith, and failure to settle within policy limits; (2) such claim, whether…”
Ronnau v. Caravan Int'l Corp., 468 P.2d 118 (Kan. 1970). “(Gard, Kansas Code of Civil Procedure, Attachment and Garnishment, § 60-724, p. 606.) The unliquidated claim was clearly not subject to garnishment, and the district court did not err in concluding that Caravan s claim against INA was not subject to garnishment.”
Bartlett Coop. Ass'n v. Patton, 722 P.2d 551 (Kan. 1986). “However, K.S.A. 60-724 explicitly provides that “[n]o judgment shall be rendered in garnishment by reason of the garnishee[’s] .”
In Re Garrity, 144 B.R. 895 (Bankr. D. Kan. 1992). “In support of this argument, the debtor cites K.S.A. § 60-724(2) which provides as follows: Exceptions.”
Nicklin v. Harper, 860 P.2d 31 (Kan. Ct. App. 1993). “An excellent discussion of garnishment in Kansas is found in, Graves, Garnishment in Kansas: a Procedural Paradox, 49 J.”
Curiel v. Quinn, 832 P.2d 1206 (Kan. Ct. App. 1992). “60-955) was entirely deleted when the present statute (K.S.A. 60-724) was enacted. Likewise the provision in G.”
Asbury v. Mauk, 687 P.2d 31 (Kan. Ct. App. 1984). “(In this regard, see, for example, the exceptions enumerated in K.S.A. 60-724 and, by K.S.A. 61-2012, made applicable to Limited Actions proceedings.”
– Leaf Funding, Inc. v. Simmons Med. Clinic (Kan. Ct. App. 2017). “K.S.A. 60-724(3) states: "No judgment shall be rendered in garnishment by reason of the garnishee .”
— K.S.A. § 60-724(2) — 4 cases
Geer v. Eby, 432 P.3d 1001 (Kan. 2019). “" K.S.A. 60-724(2). This court has interpreted this provision as intended to exclude garnishment of unliquidated tort claims.”
In Re Adcock, 264 B.R. 708 (D. Kan. 2000). “1992), where the court found that K.S.A. § 60-724(2) does not constitute an exemption within the meaning of 11 U.”
In Re Doughman, 263 B.R. 905 (Bankr. D. Kan. 1999). “1992), where the court found that K.S.A. § 60-724(2) does not constitute an exemption within the meaning of 11 U.”
In Re Garrity, 144 B.R. 895 (Bankr. D. Kan. 1992). “In support of this argument, the debtor cites K.S.A. § 60-724(2) which provides as follows: Exceptions.”
— K.S.A. § 60-724(3) — 1 case
– Leaf Funding, Inc. v. Simmons Med. Clinic (Kan. Ct. App. 2017). “K.S.A. 60-724(3) states: "No judgment shall be rendered in garnishment by reason of the garnishee .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.