K.S.A. » Chapter 65
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 65-2862 (2026)

Penalties for violations of act; second conviction

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

65-2862. Penalties for violations of act; second conviction. Any person violating any of the provisions of this act, except as specific penalties are herein otherwise imposed, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall pay a fine of not less than fifty dollars ($50) nor more than two hundred dollars ($200) for each separate offense, and a person for a second violation of any of the provisions of this act, wherein another specific penalty is not expressly imposed, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall pay a fine of not less than one hundred dollars ($100) nor more than five hundred dollars ($500) for each separate offense.

History: L. 1957, ch. 343, § 62; July 1.


Previous | Next

www.ksrevisor.gov 2026
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2007–2022 · leading case: Williamson v. Amrani, 152 P.3d 60 (Kan. 2007).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Williamson v. Amrani, 152 P.3d 60 (Kan. 2007). · cites it 2× “If the Board determines that a violation has taken place, the violator shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and may be required to pay both criminal fines (K.S.A. 65-2862) and civil fines (K.S.A. 65-2863a).”
Comprehensive Health of Planned Parenthood of Kansas & Mid-Missouri, Inc. v. Templeton, 954 F. Supp. 2d 1205 (D. Kan. 2013). · cites it 2× “See Kan. Stat. Ann. § 65-2862 . A licensed ambulatory surgical center must report to the Kansas Board of Healing Arts when a physician has acted in a manner which may be grounds for disciplinary action.”
Trust Women Found., Inc. v. Bennett (Kan. Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 2× “K.S.A. 65-2862. The district court concluded that the Attorney General is ethically bound to comply with the Agreed Order to enjoin enforcement of K.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.