Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 65-4113 (2026)

Substances included in schedule V

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

65-4113. Substances included in schedule V. (a) The controlled substances or drugs, by whatever official name, common or usual name, chemical name or brand name designated, listed in this section are included in schedule V.

(b) Any compound, mixture or preparation containing limited quantities of any of the following narcotic drugs which also contains one or more nonnarcotic active medicinal ingredients in sufficient proportion to confer upon the compound, mixture or preparation valuable medicinal qualities other than those possessed by the narcotic drug alone:

(1) Not more than 200 milligrams of codeine or any of its salts per 100 milliliters or per 100 grams.

(2) Not more than 100 milligrams of dihydrocodeine or any of its salts per 100 milliliters or per 100 grams.

(3) Not more than 100 milligrams of ethylmorphine or any of its salts per 100 milliliters or per 100 grams.

(4) Not more than 2.5 milligrams of diphenoxylate and not less than 25 micrograms of atropine sulfate per dosage unit.

(5) Not more than 100 milligrams of opium per 100 milliliters or per 100 grams.

(6) Not more than .5 milligram of difenoxin (9168) and not less than 25 micrograms of atropine sulfate per dosage unit.

(c) Unless specifically excepted or unless listed in another schedule, any material, compound, mixture or preparation which contains any quantity of the following substances having a stimulant effect on the central nervous system, including its salts, isomers (whether optical, position or geometric) and salts of such isomers whenever the existence of such salts, isomers and salts of isomers is possible within the specific chemical designation:

  • (1)   Propylhexedrine (except when part of a compound used for nasal decongestion which
  •         is authorized to be sold lawfully over the counter without a prescription under
  •         the federal food, drug and cosmetic act, so long as it is used only for such purpose)8161
  • (2)   Pyrovalerone1485

(d) Any compound, mixture or preparation containing any detectable quantity of ephedrine, its salts or optical isomers, or salts of optical isomers.

(e) Any compound, mixture or preparation containing any detectable quantity of pseudoephedrine, its salts or optical isomers, or salts of optical isomers.

(f) Unless specifically exempted or excluded or unless listed in another schedule, any material, compound, mixture, or preparation which contains any quantity of the following substances having a depressant effect on the central nervous system, including its salts:

  • (1)   Brivaracetam ((2S)-2-[(4R)-2-oxo-4-propylpyrrolidin-1-yl] butanamide) (some trade or
  •         other names BRV; UCB-34714; Briviact)2710
  • (2)   Cenobamate [(1R)-1-(2-chlorophenyl)-2-(tetrazol-2-yl)ethyl] carbamate2720
  • (3)   Ezogabine N-[2-amino-4(4-fluorobenzylamino)-phenyl]-carbamic acid ethyl ester2779
  • (4)   Ganaxolone2401
  • (5)   Lacosamide [(R)-2-acetoamido-N-benzyl-3-methoxy-propionamide]2746
  • (6)   Lasmiditan [2,4,6-trifluoro-N-(6-(1-methylpiperidine-4-carbonyl)pyridine-2-yl-benzamide2790
  • (7)   Pregabalin [(S)-3-(aminomethyl)-5-methylhexanoic acid]2782

History: L. 1972, ch. 234, § 13; L. 1982, ch. 269, § 6; L. 1984, ch. 243, § 1; L. 1985, ch. 220, § 5; L. 1991, ch. 199, § 5; L. 1992, ch. 174, § 4; L. 1995, ch. 218, § 3; L. 2005, ch. 153, § 2; L. 2007, ch. 169, § 12; L. 2011, ch. 83, § 7; L. 2012, ch. 107, § 9; L. 2017, ch. 57, § 7; L. 2022, ch. 99, § 6; L. 2024, ch. 67, § 7; July 1.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2009–2012 · leading case: State v. Snellings, 273 P.3d 739 (Kan. 2012).
State v. Snellings, 273 P.3d 739 (Kan. 2012). · cites it 13× “65-4111 lists Schedule IV substances, and K.S.A. 2007 Supp. 65-4113 lists Schedule V substances.”
State v. Surowski, 212 P.3d 229 (Kan. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 2× “Thus, Surowski may not avail herself of K.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.