History:
L. 1921, ch. 272, § 1; R.S. 1923, 72-2142; L. 1974, ch. 364, § 9; Repealed, L. 1978, ch. 430, § 11; April 1.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. K.S.A. 72-2143 relating to sale and distribution of proceeds void. The State, ex rel., v. Turner, 111 Kan. 302, 303, 207 P. 223.
2. Mentioned in appeal from quiet title judgment; effects of accretion and avulsion on ownership of riverbed of navigable rivers. Murray v. State, 226 Kan. 26, 30, 31, 32, 34, 39, 596 P.2d 805.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1
case, 1979–1979 · leading case: Murray v. State, 596 P.2d 805 (Kan. 1979).
Murray v. State, 596 P.2d 805 (Kan. 1979). · cites it 7דWith respect to the Miller Patent described above, there is no evidence of non-compliance by the defendants, Miller, or the State of Kansas with the provisions of K.S.A. 72-2142 and 72-2145. In the absence of evidence of noncompliance with such requirements, the court presumes…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.