History:
L. 2015, ch. 72, § 1; Expired, June 30, 2020.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. The freedom from unsafe restraint and seclusion act does not create a public policy exception to Kansas' at-will employment doctrine. King v. U.S.D. No. 501, 63 Kan. App. 2d 758, 539 P.3d 1045 (2023), rev. denied (Feb. 22, 2024).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2019–2023 · leading case: King v. U.S.D. 501, No. 125117 (Kan. Ct. App. Nov. 9, 2023).
King v. U.S.D. 501, No. 125117 (Kan. Ct. App. Nov. 9, 2023). · cites it 3דNeither the Freedom from Unsafe Restraint and Seclusion Act (FURSA)—K.S.A. 2022 Supp. 72-6151 et seq.—and the attendant Kansas regulations that mirror it—K.”
Donahue v. Brownback, No. 18-3237 (10th Cir. July 9, 2019). “Donahue alleged that because Brownback signed the Freedom from Unsafe Restraint and Seclusion Act, Kan. Stat. Ann. § 72-6151 to 72-6158, authorizing the use of such isolation cells in special-needs classrooms, he was liable for DCD’s confinement in the cell, which violated DCD’s…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.