Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 74-3201 (2026)

Repealed

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

74-3201.

History: L. 1925, ch. 259, § 1; L. 1939, ch. 289, § 1; L. 1982, ch. 347, § 39; L. 1995, ch. 241, § 12; Repealed, L. 1999, ch. 147, § 132; July 1.

CASE ANNOTATIONS

1. Senate failed to confirm appointment before adjournment; vacancy occurred; recess appointment valid. Driscoll v. Hershberger, 172 Kan. 145, 146, 148, 149, 155, 238 P.2d 493.

2. Referred to in upholding constitutionality of K.S.A. 22-3707; Senate rejection of appointment upheld. Leek v. Theis, 217 Kan. 784, 791, 539 P.2d 304.

3. Board of regents is an employer under public employer-employee relations act. Kansas Bd. of Regents v. Pittsburg State Univ. Chap. of K-NEA, 233 Kan. 801, 811, 667 P.2d 306 (1983).


Previous | Next

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1983–2003 · leading case: Kansas Bd. of Regents v. Pittsburg State Univ. Chapter, 667 P.2d 306 (Kan. 1983).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Kansas Bd. of Regents v. Pittsburg State Univ. Chapter, 667 P.2d 306 (Kan. 1983). · cites it 2× “" By K.S.A. 1982 Supp. 74-3201 et seq., the legislature created a nine-member state board, to be known as the Board of Regents.”
Connelly v. Kansas High. Patrol, 26 P.3d 1246 (Kan. 2001). “See K.S.A. 74-3201 et seq. (die Regents); K.S.”
Prager v. Kansas Dept. of Revenue, 20 P.3d 39 (Kan. 2001). “See K.S.A. 74-3201 et seq. (the Regents); K.S.”
Bland v. Kansas City, Kansas Cmty. Coll., 271 F. Supp. 2d 1280 (D. Kan. 2003). · cites it 2× “As indicated in the revisor’s note preceding the Kansas Higher Education Coordination Act, K.S.A. § 74-3201 et seq., the state board of regents was reconstituted by 1999 Senate Bill No.”
Goldbarth v. Kansas State Bd. of Regents, 9 P.3d 1251 (Kan. 2000). “See K.S.A. 74-3201 et seq. (the Regents); K.S.”
State, Dep't of Admin. v. Pub. Employees Relations Bd., 894 P.2d 777 (Kan. 1995). “See K.S.A. 74-3201 et seq.; K.S.A. 1994 Supp.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.