K.S.A. » Chapter 75
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 75-3202 (2026)

Repealed

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

75-3202.

History: L. 1931, ch. 294, § 2; Repealed, L. 1995, ch. 184, § 4; April 27.

CASE ANNOTATIONS

1. Statute specific while K.S.A. 21-3904 general; state employee charged hereunder cannot also be charged under K.S.A. 21-3904. State v. Wilson, 11 Kan. App. 2d 504, 728 P.2d 1332 (1986).

2. Cited in holding K.S.A. 39-720 is proper statute for welfare fraud charge rather than general statute charging false writing (K.S.A. 21-3711). State v. Wilcox, 245 Kan. 76, 78, 775 P.2d 177 (1989).

3. Specific and general statutes compared; K.S.A. 21-3707 as specific statute, K.S.A. 21-3711 as general statute examined. State v. Montgomery, 14 Kan. App. 2d 577, 580, 796 P.2d 559 (1990).


Previous | Next

www.ksrevisor.gov 2026
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1986–1997 · leading case: State v. Wilson, 728 P.2d 1332 (Kan. Ct. App. 1986).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Wilson, 728 P.2d 1332 (Kan. Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 23× “21-3904, and of presentment of claims not incurred, in violation of K.S.A. 75-3202. The first issue is whether it was improper to charge and convict defendant under both K.”
State v. Wilcox, 775 P.2d 177 (Kan. 1989). · cites it 4× “21-3904, and with presenting a claim for expenses which were not in fact incurred, in violation of K.S.A. 75-3202. Both claims arose out of the same act.”
State v. Fritz, 933 P.2d 126 (Kan. 1997). “21-3904 (Ensley 1981), presenting a false claim, and K.S.A. 75-3202, a state employee’s presenting an account for expenses not in fact incurred.”
State v. Montgomery, 796 P.2d 559 (Kan. Ct. App. 1990). · cites it 3× “21-3904 and also with presenting a claim for expenses which were not in fact incurred contrary to K.S.A. 75-3202. Both claims arose out of the same act.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.