Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 8-1560c (2026)

Certain violations of maximum speed limits not construed as moving traffic violations

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

8-1560c. Certain violations of maximum speed limits not construed as moving traffic violations. (a) Any conviction or forfeiture of bail or bond for violating a maximum posted or authorized speed limit of 30 miles per hour or more but not exceeding 54 miles per hour on any highway, by not more than six miles per hour, shall not be construed as a moving traffic violation for the purpose of K.S.A. 8-255, and amendments thereto.

(b) Any conviction or forfeiture of bail or bond for violating the maximum posted or authorized speed limit of 55 miles per hour or more but not exceeding 75 miles per hour on any highway, by not more than 10 miles per hour, shall not be construed as a moving traffic violation for the purpose of K.S.A. 8-255, and amendments thereto.

History: L. 1996, ch. 15, § 3; L. 1996, ch. 220, § 9; L. 2001, ch. 184, § 2; L. 2007, ch. 181, § 7; L. 2011, ch. 45, § 6; July 1.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2010–2020 · leading case: – State v. Jenkins –, 455 P.3d 779 (Kan. 2020).
– State v. Jenkins –, 455 P.3d 779 (Kan. 2020). “K.S.A. 8-1560c, relating to violating maximum speed limits, likewise specifically limits certain speeding violations from being treated as moving traffic violations for purposes of K.”
State v. Castleberry, 293 P.3d 757 (Kan. Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 3× “In lieu of providing an exhaustive definition, K.S.A. 2009 Supp. 8-1560c identifies certain traffic violations that are excluded from the definition of “moving violations,” including any speeding offense within 6 to 10 miles per hour over the applicable speed limit.”
State v. Richardson, 224 P.3d 553 (Kan. 2010). “K.S.A. 8-1560c, relating to violating maximum speed limits, likewise specifically limits certain speeding violations from being treated as moving traffic violations for purposes of K.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.