Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 8-611 (2026)

Repealed

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

8-611.

History: L. 1969, ch. 50, § 1; L. 1985, ch. 49, § 1; Repealed, L. 1988, ch. 211, § 11; July 1.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1972–1991 · leading case: State v. Kliewer, 504 P.2d 580 (Kan. 1972).
State v. Kliewer, 504 P.2d 580 (Kan. 1972). · cites it 7× “: This is an appeal from a conviction on two misdemeanor counts: (1) Turning back the odometer used for registering the mileage on a motor vehicle countrary to K.S.A. 1971 Supp. 8-611 ( b ), and (2) Committing a deceptive commercial practice contrary to K.”
State v. Palmer, 810 P.2d 734 (Kan. 1991). “2d 580 (1972), where the defendant, who had turned back an odometer, was convicted of two misdemeanors: (1) turning back the odometer used for registering the mileage on a motor vehicle, in violation of K.S.A. 1971 Supp. 8-611(b), and (2) committing a deceptive commercial…”
State v. Wilson, 728 P.2d 1332 (Kan. Ct. App. 1986). “In that case, Kliewer was convicted of turning back an odometer used for registering mileage on a motor vehicle contrary to K.S.A. 1971 Supp. 8-611, and of committing a deceptive commercial practice, K.”
R. B. Enter., Inc. v. State, 747 P.2d 152 (Kan. 1987). “Checks under this section may include inspection for possible violation of K.S.A. 8-611 and amendments thereto or other evidence of possible fraud.”
State v. Montgomery, 796 P.2d 559 (Kan. Ct. App. 1990). “2d 580 (1972) (person charged with the specific crime of turning back an odometer on a motor vehicle, K.S.A. 8-611[b], cannot also be charged with the general crime of a deceptive commercial practice, K.”
K.S.A. § 8-611(b): 1 case
State v. Palmer, 810 P.2d 734 (Kan. 1991). “2d 580 (1972), where the defendant, who had turned back an odometer, was convicted of two misdemeanors: (1) turning back the odometer used for registering the mileage on a motor vehicle, in violation of K.S.A. 1971 Supp. 8-611(b), and (2) committing a deceptive commercial…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.