History:
L. 1957, ch. 68, § 7; Repealed, L. 1973, ch. 198, § 22; January 1, 1974; L. 1974, ch. 193, § 22; February 22.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Exceptions noted in reviewing purpose of act. Agee v. Kansas Highway Commission, 198 Kan. 173, 174, 422 P.2d 949.
2. Mentioned; action for garnishment of insurer; third party beneficiary aspects of liability insurance contracts discussed. Nichols v. Marshall, 491 F.2d 177, 180.
Bartee v. R.T.C. Transp., Inc., 781 P.2d 1084 (Kan. 1989). “According to this argument, to be an automobile liability insurance policy, the policy itself must insure the operation of a specified motor vehicle or a specified individual operating a non-owned vehicle as defined in K.S.A. 8-728(a)(l) or (2) (Corrick). Plaintiffs point out…”
Nichols v. Marshall, 491 F.2d 177 (10th Cir. 1974). “K.S.A. 8-728. As concerns the general nature of such a policy of insurance, K.”
Nichols v. Marshall, 491 F.2d 177 (10th Cir. 1974). “K.S.A. 8-728. As concerns the general nature of such a policy of insurance, K.”
— K.S.A. § 8-728(a)(l) — 1 case
Bartee v. R.T.C. Transp., Inc., 781 P.2d 1084 (Kan. 1989). “According to this argument, to be an automobile liability insurance policy, the policy itself must insure the operation of a specified motor vehicle or a specified individual operating a non-owned vehicle as defined in K.S.A. 8-728(a)(l) or (2) (Corrick). Plaintiffs point out…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.