Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 84-2-604 (2026)

Buyer's options as to salvage of rightfully rejected goods

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

84-2-604. Buyer's options as to salvage of rightfully rejected goods. Subject to the provisions of the immediately preceding section on perishables if the seller gives no instructions within a reasonable time after notification of rejection the buyer may store the rejected goods for the seller's account or reship them to him or resell them for the seller's account with reimbursement as provided in the preceding section. Such action is not acceptance or conversion.

History: L. 1965, ch. 564, § 84; January 1, 1966.

KANSAS COMMENT, 1996

This section supplements the previous two sections and provides both merchant and non-merchant buyers with various options in the event the seller does not give instructions within a reasonable time after rejection. Buyers may store the rejected goods, reship the goods to the seller, or resell the goods for the seller's account and be reimbursed for expenses under 84-2-603(2). The Official Comment indicates that this list is "not exhaustive but merely illustrative." This section does not impose any duties on buyers to act; it merely gives buyers options and prevents their actions from being treated as acceptance or conversion of the goods. This section does not, however, override the merchant buyer's duty to resell perishable goods under 84-2-603(1).

Law Review and Bar Journal References:

This section frees any action taken under K.S.A. 84-2-606 (1) (c) from claims of acceptance or conversion of the goods, Keith Hey, 7 W.L.J. 35, 36 (1967).

"The Buyer's Right to Return Unsatisfactory Goods—The Uniform Commercial Code Remedies of Rejection and Revocation of Acceptance," George I. Wallach, 20 W.L.J. 20, 28, 30 (1980).

CASE ANNOTATIONS

1. Cited; measure of damages discussed for buyer's use of vehicle after revocation of acceptance. Johnson v. General Motors Corp., 233 Kan. 1044, 1048, 668 P.2d 139 (1983).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1983–2002 · leading case: Queen v. Lynch Jewelers, LLC, 55 P.3d 914 (Kan. Ct. App. 2002).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Queen v. Lynch Jewelers, LLC, 55 P.3d 914 (Kan. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 6× “If Lynch Jewelers did not provide reasonable instructions, then Queen could have stored the rejected ring, reshipped the ring to Lynch Jewelers, or resold the ring for Lynch Jewelers’ account, all at Lynch Jewelers’ expense. See K.S.A. 84-2-604. In addition, Queen could have…”
Johnson v. Gen. Motors Corp., 668 P.2d 139 (Kan. 1983). “84-2-603 and K.S.A. 84-2-604. A buyer is not permitted to retain such funds as he might believe adequate for his damages if he resells the goods.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.