Ky. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 118
Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 118.110 (2026)

Repealed, 1972

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Catchline at repeal: Candidate who is defeated or who violates corrupt practice law in primary cannot have name on regular election ballot -- Exception as to defeat of judicial candidates. History: Repealed 1972 Ky. Acts ch. 188, sec. 69, effective December 1, 1972. -- Recodified 1942 Ky. Acts ch. 208, sec. 1, effective October 1, 1942, from Ky. Stat. secs. 1550-5a, 1550-5b.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1953–1969 · leading case: Rosenberg v. Queenan, 261 S.W.2d 617 (Ky. Ct. App. 1953).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Rosenberg v. Queenan, 261 S.W.2d 617 (Ky. Ct. App. 1953). · cites it 6× “The answer of the clerk pleaded that Rosenberg was defeated for the nomination in the August 1953 Republican primary and by the provisions of KRS 118.110(1) he is not entitled to have his name placed on the ballot.”
Mann v. Cornett, 445 S.W.2d 853 (Ky. Ct. App. 1969). · cites it 3× “We have already pointed out that KRS 118.110 specifically excepts judicial candidates from its provision preventing a candidate defeated in the primary from having his name printed on the ballot for the same office at the ensuing general election.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 118.110(1) — 2 cases
Rosenberg v. Queenan, 261 S.W.2d 617 (Ky. Ct. App. 1953). “The answer of the clerk pleaded that Rosenberg was defeated for the nomination in the August 1953 Republican primary and by the provisions of KRS 118.110(1) he is not entitled to have his name placed on the ballot.”
Mann v. Cornett, 445 S.W.2d 853 (Ky. Ct. App. 1969). “We have already pointed out that KRS 118.110 specifically excepts judicial candidates from its provision preventing a candidate defeated in the primary from having his name printed on the ballot for the same office at the ensuing general election.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.