Ky. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 205
Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 205.234 (2026)

Repealed, 1996

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Catchline at repeal: Judicial review of appeal board decision on public assistance -- Judgment. History: Repealed 1996 Ky. Acts ch. 318, sec. 357, effective July 15, 1996. -- Amended 1974 Ky. Acts ch. 74, Art. VI, sec. 107(21). -- Created 1964 Ky. Acts ch. 89, sec. 2.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1966–1973 · leading case: Dawson v. Hensley, 423 S.W.2d 911 (Ky. Ct. App. 1968).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Dawson v. Hensley, 423 S.W.2d 911 (Ky. Ct. App. 1968). · cites it 2× “The judgment is reversed and the case is remanded for review as prescribed by KRS 205.234. All concur.”
Dawson v. Driver, 420 S.W.2d 553 (Ky. Ct. App. 1967). “Fully mindful of KRS 205.234(3), which confines the circuit court’s review to a determination, from the record certified to it, of whether (a) there was sufficient probative evidence to support the board’s order, (b) the dispositive regulations are reasonable, and (c) the board…”
Heucker v. Clifton, 500 S.W.2d 398 (Ky. Ct. App. 1973). “The court proceedings, which were brought pursuant to KRS 205.234, sought review of a decision of the board holding that the department had correctly processed appellees’ application for public assistance for medical care.”
Huecker v. Rains, 483 S.W.2d 114 (Ky. Ct. App. 1972). “Smith’s diagnosis was that claimant had a neurotic personality, that a chronic duodenal ulcer possibly existed and that the patient had a small goiter clinically euthyroid.”
Hogue v. Comm'r of Econ. Sec., 407 S.W.2d 437 (Ky. Ct. App. 1966). “The order of the Appeal Board was then appealed to the Barren Circuit Court (KRS 205.234). On December 4, 1964, that court reversed the order and by a supplemental judgment directed that retroactive payments be made from June 1, 1964 to December 1, 1964.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 205.234(3) — 3 cases
Dawson v. Driver, 420 S.W.2d 553 (Ky. Ct. App. 1967). “Fully mindful of KRS 205.234(3), which confines the circuit court’s review to a determination, from the record certified to it, of whether (a) there was sufficient probative evidence to support the board’s order, (b) the dispositive regulations are reasonable, and (c) the board…”
Dawson v. Hensley, 423 S.W.2d 911 (Ky. Ct. App. 1968). “The judgment is reversed and the case is remanded for review as prescribed by KRS 205.234. All concur.”
Huecker v. Rains, 483 S.W.2d 114 (Ky. Ct. App. 1972). “Smith’s diagnosis was that claimant had a neurotic personality, that a chronic duodenal ulcer possibly existed and that the patient had a small goiter clinically euthyroid.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.