Catchline at repeal: Issuance of summons and notice -- Temporary custody of child.
History: Repealed 1986 Ky. Acts ch. 423, sec. 198, effective July 1, 1987; amended
1986 Ky. Acts ch. 170, sec. 1, effective July 15, 1986. -- Amended 1978 Ky. Acts ch.
137, sec. 15, effective June 17, 1978. -- Amended 1970 Ky. Acts ch. 231, sec. 1,
effective June 18, 1970. -- Created 1952 Ky. Acts ch. 161, sec. 8, effective January 1,
1953.
Note: This section was repealed by 1980 Ky. Acts ch. 280, which was to have become
effective July 1, 1982. Thereafter, 1982 Ky. Acts ch. 284 changed the effective date
of that act to July 15, 1984. Then, 1984 Ky. Acts ch. 184 repealed both 1980 Ky.
Acts ch. 280, and 1982 Ky. Acts ch. 284.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
6
cases, 1971–1985 · leading case:
Baker v. Smith, 477 S.W.2d 149 (Ky. Ct. App. 1971).
Baker v. Smith, 477 S.W.2d 149 (Ky. Ct. App. 1971).
· cites it 2× “540” is constitutional, recognizing that under KRS 208.080 and 208.110 there is ample authority in the juvenile court to release a child from detention.”
Schooley v. Commonwealth, 556 S.W.2d 912 (Ky. Ct. App. 1977).
“2d 70 (1971), the claim was made that the juvenile court acquired no jurisdiction because of its failure to notify the juvenile’s parent, guardian or custodian as required by KRS 208.080 and 208.090. As the juvenile court allegedly lacked jurisdiction, it was then argued that it…”
Baker v. Hamilton, 345 F. Supp. 345 (W.D. Ky. 1972).
· cites it 2× “KRS 208.080, 208.110, 208.120 and 208.130 effectively control the custodial disposition oñ children pending a dispositional hearing.”
Anderson v. Commonwealth, 465 S.W.2d 70 (Ky. Ct. App. 1971).
· cites it 2× “” KRS 208.080 and 208.090 prescribe procedures for notifying the parent, guardian, or custodian (unless they appear voluntarily) of the substance of the petition and directing such person to “bring” the juvenile before the court at an appointed time and place.”
Copas v. Copas, 699 S.W.2d 758 (Ky. Ct. App. 1985).
“Be it remembered that for emergency needs of a child the district court is empowered to provide protection by granting temporary custody under KRS 403.”
Bailey v. Commonwealth, 468 S.W.2d 304 (Ky. Ct. App. 1971).
· cites it 2× “Appellant’s first assault on the juvenile court proceeding is that no summons was served on his mother (his father having been dead for some time) of the charges against him as required by KRS 208.080. Filed as Exhibit “B” with appellant’s brief is a copy of the order of the…”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 208.080(2) — 2 cases
Copas v. Copas, 699 S.W.2d 758 (Ky. Ct. App. 1985).
“Be it remembered that for emergency needs of a child the district court is empowered to provide protection by granting temporary custody under KRS 403.”
Baker v. Smith, 477 S.W.2d 149 (Ky. Ct. App. 1971).
“540” is constitutional, recognizing that under KRS 208.080 and 208.110 there is ample authority in the juvenile court to release a child from detention.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.