Ky. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 21

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 21.580

Repealed, 2007, but expiration of program extended by court order until January

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

31, 2009. Catchline at repeal: Senior Status Program for Special Judges. History: Amended 2003 Ky. Acts ch. 128, sec. 6, effective June 24, 2003. -- Amended 2002 Ky. Acts ch. 258, sec. 1, effective July 15, 2002. -- Repealed 2000 Ky. Acts ch. 305, sec. 4, effective July 1, 2007 -- Created 2000 Ky. Acts ch. 305, sec. 1, effective July 14, 2000. Legislative Research Commission Note (5/23/2007). 2000 Ky. Acts ch. 305, sec. 1, created KRS 21.580, which established the Senior Status Program for Special Judges. Section 4 of that Act repealed KRS 21.580, effective July 1, 2007. Thereafter, 2002 Ky. Acts ch. 258, sec. 1, amended KRS 21.580 to change the retirement date from June 30, 2007, to January 31, 2009, but did not specifically address the repeal set out in the 2000 Act. On May 23, 2007, the Franklin Circuit Court held that "[t]he General Assembly intended the 2002 Amendment to the Senior Status Program to extend both the date of enrollment and the date of expiration of the program until January 31, 2009." George v. Board of Trustees of Judicial Form Retirement System, 07-CI-00587.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 31 cases, 2005–2014 · leading case: Hon George W. Davis III v. Hon Thomas D. Wingate Judge, Franklin Circuit Court Div. II
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Hon George W. Davis III v. Hon Thomas D. Wingate Judge, Franklin Circuit Court Div. II (2014) ky · cites it 12× “1 It sought to prohibit "a judge acting as a Senior Status Special Judge" from "becom[ing] a candidate for any elected office during the five (5) year term prescribed in KRS 21.580[1" 2 To this end, the following language—or a slight variation thereof3—was inserted to amend the…”
Cox v. Braden (2008) ky “Senior Judge Winchester then had no claim to the case, since senior judge assignments are made by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court pursuant to KRS 21.580. Proper procedure was followed in this case, and the Appellants had no entitlement by rule or otherwise to have Judge…”
Benningfield v. Pettit Environmental, Inc. (2005) kyctapp “Miller sitting as Special Judge by assignment of the Chief Justice pursuant to Section 110(5)(b) of the Kentucky Constitution and KRS 21.580. [2] Op. at 571. [3] Grzyb, <a href="/opinion/2419353/grzyb-v-evans/#401" aria-description="Citation for case: Grzyb v.”
Reyna v. Commonwealth (2007) kyctapp “Paisley sitting as Special Judge by assignment of the Chief Justice pursuant to Section 110(5)(b) of the Kentucky Constitution and KRS 21.580.”
Monumental Life Insurance Co. v. Department of Revenue (2008) kyctapp “Henry sitting as Special Judges by assignment of the Chief Justice pursuant to Section 110(5)(b) of the Kentucky Constitution and KRS 21.580. [2] For convenience, we include appellees the City of Louisville and Jefferson County in our references to the Cabinet.”
Dutschke v. Jim Russell Realtors, Inc. (2008) kyctapp “Henry, sitting as Special Judge by assignment of the Chief Justice pursuant to Section 110(5)(b) of the Kentucky Constitution and KRS 21.580. [2] The Arbitrator concluded that it was not.”
Lawson v. Lawson (2009) kyctapp “Harris, sitting as Special Judge by assignment of the Chief Justice pursuant to Section 110(5)(b) of the Kentucky Constitution and KRS 21.580. [2] Kentucky Rules of Civil Procedure.”
City of Somerset v. Bell (2005) kyctapp “Miller sitting as Special Judge by assignment of the Chief Justice pursuant to Section 110(5)(b) of the Kentucky Constitution and KRS 21.580. [2] Kentucky Revised Statutes.”
Cabinet for Health & Family Services v. J.T.G. (2009) kyctapp “Harris, sitting as Special Judge by assignment of the Chief Justice pursuant to Section 110(5)(b) of the Kentucky Constitution and KRS 21.580. [2] Kinship care is established by KRS 605.”
Commonwealth v. Maynard (2009) kyctapp “Harris, sitting as Special Judge by assignment of the Chief Justice pursuant to Section 110(5)(b) of the Kentucky Constitution and KRS 21.580 [2] Although purporting to represent Maynard's estate, Appellee's attorney did argue at the forfeiture hearing that the Commonwealth's…”
Holland v. Commonwealth (2006) kyctapp “Paisley sitting as Special Judge by assignment of the Chief Justice pursuant to Section 110(5)(b) of the Kentucky Constitution and KRS 21.580. [2] Indeed, the Commonwealth argues that the limitation on the weapon is logical because a person who is truly being abused is more…”
Allen v. Commonwealth (2009) kyctapp “Buckingham sitting as Special Judge by assignment of the Chief Justice pursuant to Section 110(5)(b) of the Kentucky Constitution and KRS 21.580. [2] Miranda v. Arizona, <a href="/opinion/107252/miranda-v-arizona/" aria-description="Citation for case: Miranda v.”
Show all 31 citing cases →
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 21.580(1)(a) — 2 cases
Hon George W. Davis III v. Hon Thomas D. Wingate Judge, Franklin Circuit Court Div. II (2014) ky “1 It sought to prohibit "a judge acting as a Senior Status Special Judge" from "becom[ing] a candidate for any elected office during the five (5) year term prescribed in KRS 21.580[1" 2 To this end, the following language—or a slight variation thereof3—was inserted to amend the…”
Hon George W. Davis III v. Hon Thomas D. Wingate Judge, Franklin Circuit Court Div. II (2014) ky
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 21.580(l)(a) — 1 case
Hon George W. Davis III v. Hon Thomas D. Wingate Judge, Franklin Circuit Court Div. II (2014) ky “1 It sought to prohibit "a judge acting as a Senior Status Special Judge" from "becom[ing] a candidate for any elected office during the five (5) year term prescribed in KRS 21.580[1" 2 To this end, the following language—or a slight variation thereof3—was inserted to amend the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.