Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 216C.005 (2026)

Repealed, 2019

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Catchline at repeal: Purpose of chapter. (Declared void) History: Repealed 2019 Ky. Acts ch. 180, sec. 2, effective June 27, 2019. -- Created 2017 Ky. Acts ch. 22, sec. 1, effective June 29, 2017.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2018–2022 · leading case: Craig Snowden v. Kevin Snyder Art M.D. (Ky. Ct. App. 2022).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Craig Snowden v. Kevin Snyder Art M.D. (Ky. Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 2× “The MRP Act, KRS 216C.005 et seq., became effective June 29, 2017, and through it the General Assembly established “medical review panels to review proposed malpractice complaints against health care providers covered by this chapter.”

Est. of Kendrick Bell, Jr. by & Through Lenise Bell as Adm'x v. Laurie Craycroft, M.D. (Ky. Ct. App. 2022). “The trial court concluded that, since the Kentucky Supreme Court held the Medical Review Panel Act (MRPA), KRS 216C.005 et seq., to be unconstitutional in its entirety, compliance with the MRP requirement could not operate to toll the running of the statute of limitations.”

Commonwealth of Kentucky, Cabinet for Health & Fam. Servs. Ex Rel., Adam Meier, in His Off. Capacity as Sec'y of the Cabinet for Health & Fam. Servs. v. Ezra Claycomb a Minor, by & Through His Next Friend, Nat. Guardian & Parent (Ky. 2018). “020(l) makes clear: All malpractice and malpractice-related claims against a health care provider, other than claims validly agreed for submission to a binding arbitration procedure, shall be reviewed by a medical 2 KRS 216C.005. 2 review panel. Such an action may not be…”

Commonwealth of Kentucky, Cabinet for Health & Fam. Servs. Ex Rel. Adam Meier, in His Off. Capacity as Sec'y of the Cabinet for Health & Fam. Servs. v. Ezra Claycomb a Minor, by & Through His Next Friend, Nat. Guardian & Parent (Ky. 2018). “020(l) makes clear: All malpractice and malpractice-related claims against a health care provider, other than claims validly agreed for submission to a binding arbitration procedure, shall be reviewed by a medical 2 KRS 216C.005. 2 review panel. Such an action may not be…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.