Ky. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 216C
Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 216C.040 (2026)

Repealed, 2019

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Catchline at repeal: Tolling of statute of limitations -- When complaint considered filed -- Filing fee. (Declared void) History: Repealed 2019 Ky. Acts ch. 180, sec. 2, effective June 27, 2019. -- Created 2017 Ky. Acts ch. 22, sec. 5, effective June 29, 2017.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2020–2022 · leading case: Mark Smith v. Wynetta Fletcher, Aprn, 613 S.W.3d 18 (Ky. 2020).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Mark Smith v. Wynetta Fletcher, Aprn, 613 S.W.3d 18 (Ky. 2020). · cites it 16× “” KRS 216C.040. On June 29, 2017, an action was filed in Franklin Circuit Court challenging the validity of the MRPA.”
Craig Snowden v. Kevin Snyder Art M.D., No. 2019 CA 001113 (Ky. Ct. App. May 12, 2022). · cites it 3× “The Smiths raised several issues in support of their appeal, including many of the same issues asserted in the present case, namely that their complaint was tolled by operation of KRS 216C.040, that the savings statute (KRS 413.”
Est. of Kendrick Bell, Jr. by & Through Lenise Bell as Adm'x v. Laurie Craycroft, M.D., 653 S.W.3d 892 (Ky. Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 3× “See KRS 216C.040(1); Smith, 613 S.W.3d at 21.”
Ky. Rev. Stat. § 216C.040(1): 3 cases
Mark Smith v. Wynetta Fletcher, Aprn, 613 S.W.3d 18 (Ky. 2020). “” KRS 216C.040. On June 29, 2017, an action was filed in Franklin Circuit Court challenging the validity of the MRPA.”
Est. of Kendrick Bell, Jr. by & Through Lenise Bell as Adm'x v. Laurie Craycroft, M.D., 653 S.W.3d 892 (Ky. Ct. App. 2022). “See KRS 216C.040(1); Smith, 613 S.W.3d at 21.”
Craig Snowden v. Kevin Snyder Art M.D., No. 2019 CA 001113 (Ky. Ct. App. May 12, 2022). “The Smiths raised several issues in support of their appeal, including many of the same issues asserted in the present case, namely that their complaint was tolled by operation of KRS 216C.040, that the savings statute (KRS 413.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.