Ky. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 28
Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 28.050 (2026)

Repealed, 1976

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Catchline at repeal: Each day's proceedings in certain courts to be drawn up, read and signed. History: Repealed 1976 (1st Extra. Sess.) Ky. Acts ch. 14, sec. 491 and sec. 492(7). -- Amended 1952 Ky. Acts ch. 84, sec. 47, effective July 1, 1953. -- Recodified 1942 Ky. Acts ch. 208, sec. 1, effective October 1, 1942, from Ky. Stat. sec. 378.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1953–1967 · leading case: City of Frankfort v. Triplett, 365 S.W.2d 328 (Ky. Ct. App. 1963).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
City of Frankfort v. Triplett, 365 S.W.2d 328 (Ky. Ct. App. 1963). “035), the keeping of minutes of proceedings (KRS 28.050), step sheets (KRS 28.060) and witnesses’ attendance records (KRS 28.”
Commonwealth v. Clarke, 340 S.W.2d 442 (Ky. Ct. App. 1960). “160. In view of the similarity of the two statutes, and since we find no basis for a conclusion that “date of a judgment” was intended to or should have a different meaning than “date judgment is rendered,” it is our opinion that the Yount case is controlling here and that the…”
Green v. Commonwealth, 413 S.W.2d 329 (Ky. Ct. App. 1967). “Appellant takes the position that the record demonstrates on its face that the purported 1950 conviction was void for want of the signature of the presiding judge of the Pulaski Quarterly Court. He points out that the indictment necessarily charged that the 1950 conviction was…”
City of Frankfort v. Yount, 262 S.W.2d 665 (Ky. Ct. App. 1953). “Appellee’s argument is untenable in view of the action of the General Assembly in 1952 in amending KRS 28.050 which formerly read: “Every clerk shall from his minutes draw up the proceedings of each day in a plain, legible manner, which after being corrected as ordered by the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.