Kentucky Revised Statutes
Ky. Rev. Stat. § 281.785 (2026)
Repealed, 1996
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Catchline at repeal: Procedure on appeal -- Powers of Circuit Court, judgment -- Appeal to Court of Appeals. History: Repealed 1996 Ky. Acts ch. 318, sec. 357, effective July 15, 1996. -- Amended 1976 Ky. Acts ch. 62, sec. 112. -- Amended 1974 Ky. Acts ch. 74, Art. IV, sec. 20(2). -- Amended 1960 Ky. Acts ch. 104, sec. 19. -- Created 1950 Ky. Acts ch. 63, sec. 44, effective June 15, 1950.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8
cases, 1951–1960 · leading case: Boyd & Usher Transp. v. S. Tank Lines, Inc., 320 S.W.2d 120 (Ky. Ct. App. 1959).
Boyd & Usher Transp. v. S. Tank Lines, Inc., 320 S.W.2d 120 (Ky. Ct. App. 1959). “From this judgment appellants, pursuant to KRS 281.785 (4), brought the present appeal.”
O'NAN v. Ecklar Moore Express, Inc., 339 S.W.2d 466 (Ky. Ct. App. 1960). “However, most of these complaints related to shipments made some two years before the hearing.”
Germann Bros. Motor Transp., Inc. v. Flora, 262 S.W.2d 821 (Ky. Ct. App. 1953). “KRS 281.785(4). Subsequent to the filing of the original record in this Court, the appellants moved the lower court for a correction of the judgment to show that it was actually signed on May 6, 1953.”
Young v. Eldridge, 243 S.W.2d 483 (Ky. Ct. App. 1951). “If there was such evidence and the Department did not act arbitrarily or capriciously, the circuit court was correct in upholding its order.”
C. & D. Motor Delivery Co. v. Schroder, 242 S.W.2d 356 (Ky. Ct. App. 1951). “In our review of the proceedings before the Division (now Department) of Motor Transportation, we are controlled by KRS 281.”
Hayes Freight Lines, Inc. v. Kentucky Truck Lines, Inc., 269 S.W.2d 903 (Ky. Ct. App. 1954). “The findings of the Department of Motor Transportation are reviewable by the court, but the power of review may be only exercised within the narrow channels provided in KRS 281.785, which limit review by the courts to the determination of whether or not the Department acted in…”
Buechel Bus Co. v. Whitaker, 288 S.W.2d 60 (Ky. Ct. App. 1956). “Although we respect the finding of the Department, KRS 281.785, that the language appearing in Certificate No.”
Hazard Express v. Dep't of Motor Transp., 320 S.W.2d 617 (Ky. Ct. App. 1959). “Court review of proceedings which were initiated before the Department of Motor Transportation is limited by KRS 281.785. This statute has been interpreted in recent opinions to give the Department, and not the courts, the authority to determine whether “ ‘public convenience and…”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 281.785(1) — 1 case
Boyd & Usher Transp. v. S. Tank Lines, Inc., 320 S.W.2d 120 (Ky. Ct. App. 1959). “From this judgment appellants, pursuant to KRS 281.785 (4), brought the present appeal.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 281.785(4) — 2 cases
Boyd & Usher Transp. v. S. Tank Lines, Inc., 320 S.W.2d 120 (Ky. Ct. App. 1959). “From this judgment appellants, pursuant to KRS 281.785 (4), brought the present appeal.”
Germann Bros. Motor Transp., Inc. v. Flora, 262 S.W.2d 821 (Ky. Ct. App. 1953). “KRS 281.785(4). Subsequent to the filing of the original record in this Court, the appellants moved the lower court for a correction of the judgment to show that it was actually signed on May 6, 1953.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.