Ky. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 311
Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 311.622 (2026)

Repealed, 1994

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Catchline at repeal: Legislative finding. History: Repealed 1994 Ky. Acts ch. 235, sec. 13, effective July 15, 1994. -- Created 1990 Ky. Acts ch. 122, sec. 1, effective July 13, 1990.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1993–2000 · leading case: DeGrella by & Through Parrent v. Elston, 858 S.W.2d 698 (Ky. 1993).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
DeGrella by & Through Parrent v. Elston, 858 S.W.2d 698 (Ky. 1993). · cites it 4× “" KRS 311.622(1). The statute goes on from there to specify one method by which a competent adult, through a "living will" as detailed in the Act, can "make a written declaration .”
Coulter v. Thomas, 33 S.W.3d 522 (Ky. 2000). · cites it 2× “621(8), (formerly KRS 311.622(1). There, we were primarily concerned with what proof of the patient's desires to forego medical treatment entirely under certain circumstances was required when the patient was no longer capable of voicing those desires personally.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 311.622(1) — 2 cases
DeGrella by & Through Parrent v. Elston, 858 S.W.2d 698 (Ky. 1993). “" KRS 311.622(1). The statute goes on from there to specify one method by which a competent adult, through a "living will" as detailed in the Act, can "make a written declaration .”
Coulter v. Thomas, 33 S.W.3d 522 (Ky. 2000). “621(8), (formerly KRS 311.622(1). There, we were primarily concerned with what proof of the patient's desires to forego medical treatment entirely under certain circumstances was required when the patient was no longer capable of voicing those desires personally.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 311.622(2) — 1 case
DeGrella by & Through Parrent v. Elston, 858 S.W.2d 698 (Ky. 1993). “" KRS 311.622(1). The statute goes on from there to specify one method by which a competent adult, through a "living will" as detailed in the Act, can "make a written declaration .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.