Ky. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 338
Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 338.010 (2026)

Repealed, 1972

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Catchline at repeal: Definitions and applicability. History: Repealed 1972 Ky. Acts ch. 251, sec. 22; amended ch. 326, sec. 1. -- Amended 1958 Ky. Acts ch. 132, sec. 1, effective June 19, 1958. -- Recodified 1942 Ky. Acts ch. 208, sec. 1, effective October 1, 1942, from Ky. Stat. secs. 1599c-4, 1599c-22, 1599c-27, 1599c-39. Legislative Research Commission Note. This section was repealed by Acts 1972, ch. 251, § 22, and amended by Acts 1972, ch. 326, § 1. The total purpose of the two acts appears to be served by repeal of this section and replacement with KRS 338.015, and the acts have been compiled accordingly.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1978–2024 · leading case: Bd. of Trs. of Univ. of Kentucky v. Pub. Employees Council No. 51 Am. Fed'n of State, 571 S.W.2d 616 (Ky. 1978).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Bd. of Trs. of Univ. of Kentucky v. Pub. Employees Council No. 51 Am. Fed'n of State, 571 S.W.2d 616 (Ky. 1978). “010(2), for Chapter 337, relating to ‘Wages and Hours’, and in KRS 338.010(3), for Chapter 338, relating to ‘Safety and Health of Employes’, but was not included in KRS 336.”
Maranda Hanson v. Marshall Cnty. Kentucky, No. 2023 CA 000697 (Ky. Ct. App. May 2, 2024). · cites it 4× “Thereafter, Appellant filed the instant action in Marshall Circuit Court setting forth the following claims: wrongful discharge (KRS 338.010 et seq. and KRS 39A.010); negligence per se (KRS 446.”
Ky. Rev. Stat. § 338.010(3): 1 case
Bd. of Trs. of Univ. of Kentucky v. Pub. Employees Council No. 51 Am. Fed'n of State, 571 S.W.2d 616 (Ky. 1978). “010(2), for Chapter 337, relating to ‘Wages and Hours’, and in KRS 338.010(3), for Chapter 338, relating to ‘Safety and Health of Employes’, but was not included in KRS 336.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.