Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 355.2-105 (2026)

Definitions: transferability -- "Goods" -- "Future" goods -- "Lot" --

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

"Commercial unit."

(1) "Goods" means all things (including specially manufactured goods) which are movable at the time of identification to the contract for sale other than the money in which the price is to be paid, investment securities (Article 8) and things in action. "Goods" also includes the unborn young of animals and growing crops and other identified things attached to realty as described in the section on goods to be severed from realty (KRS 355.2-107).

(2) Goods must be both existing and identified before any interest in them can pass. Goods which are not both existing and identified are "future" goods. A purported present sale of future goods or of any interest therein operates as a contract to sell.

(3) There may be a sale of a part interest in existing identified goods.

(4) An undivided share in an identified bulk of fungible goods is sufficiently identified to be sold although the quantity of the bulk is not determined. Any agreed proportion of such a bulk or any quantity thereof agreed upon by number, weight or other measure may to the extent of the seller's interest in the bulk be sold to the buyer who then becomes an owner in common.

(5) "Lot" means a parcel or a single article which is the subject matter of a separate sale or delivery, whether or not it is sufficient to perform the contract.

(6) "Commercial unit" means such a unit of goods as by commercial usage is a single whole for purposes of sale and division of which materially impairs its character or value on the market or in use. A commercial unit may be a single article (as a machine) or a set of articles (as a suite of furniture or an assortment of sizes) or a quantity (as a bale, gross, or carload) or any other unit treated in use or in the relevant market as a single whole. Effective: July 1, 1960 History: Created 1958 Ky. Acts ch. 77, sec. 2-105, effective July 1, 1960.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1988–2025 · leading case: Collins v. Kentucky Lottery Corp., 399 S.W.3d 449 (Ky. Ct. App. 2012).
Collins v. Kentucky Lottery Corp., 399 S.W.3d 449 (Ky. Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 3× “The trial court relied on a portion of the definition of KRS 355.2-105, which provides that goods are “all things which are movable.”
Real Est. Mktg., Inc. v. Franz, 885 S.W.2d 921 (Ky. 1994). “” The claim asserted under the Consumer Protection Act was denied by the trial court on grounds that “goods are defined in KRS 355.2-105(1), and a home does not fall within that definition,” and this ruling was not challenged on appeal.”
A & a Mech., Inc. v. Thermal Equip. Sales, Inc., 998 S.W.2d 505 (Ky. Ct. App. 1999). “As defined in KRS 355.2-105, "Goods” means all things (including specially manufactured goods) which are movable at the time of identification to the contract for sale other than the money in which the price is to be paid, investment securities (Article 8) and things in action.”
United Servs. Auto. Ass'n v. ADT Sec. Servs., Inc., 241 S.W.3d 335 (Ky. Ct. App. 2006). “2-201 and KRS 355.2-105. The Code affords no basis for an action for breach of warranty.”
Barnes v. Cmty. Trust Bank, 121 S.W.3d 520 (Ky. Ct. App. 2003). “Article 2’s definition of “goods” is found at KRS 355.2-105: (1)“Goods” means all things (including specially manufactured goods) which are movable at the time of identification to the contract for sale other than the money in which the price is to be paid, investment securities…”
Wehr Constructors, Inc. v. Steel Fabricators, Inc., 769 S.W.2d 51 (Ky. Ct. App. 1988). ““Goods” are defined as “all things (including specially manufactured goods) which are movable at the time of identification to the contract for sale other than the money in which the price is to be paid, investment securities (article 8) and things in action.”
Aud v. Illinois Cent. R.R., 955 F. Supp. 757 (W.D. Ky. 1997). “The term “goods” as used in the Uniform Commercial Code is defined in KRS 355.2-105(1) as “all things ... which are movable at the time of identification to the contract for sale____” The real estate is certainly not moveable.”
Bowling Green Livestock Mkt., Inc. v. Young (In Re Clark), 206 B.R. 439 (Bankr. W.D. Ky. 1996). “KRS 355.2-105(1). The title dispute in this case centers around the registration certificates that accompany Black Angus Cattle.”
Chesser v. Fifth Third Bank, Inc. (E.D. Ky. 2020). · cites it 4× “” Kentucky Revised Statutes (“KRS”) § 367.220(1) (emphasis added). Chesser argues that, for the purposes of the KCPA, the mortgage is the “‘good[]’ purchased by the Plaintiff.”
Laurel Grocery Co., L.L.C. v. Freshway, Inc. (E.D. Ky. 2019). “]” KRS 355.2-105(1). Freshway does not dispute Laurel’s contention that the subject “wholesale grocery products” fall within this definition.”
KY Closeouts, LLC v. Eagle Trace, Inc. (W.D. Ky. 2023). “”); KRS 355.2-105 (“‘Goods’ means all things (including specially manufactured goods) which are movable at the time of identification to the contract for sale other than the money in which the price is to be paid, investment securities (Article 8) and things in action.”
Buckner v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (W.D. Ky. 2025). “A vehicle is as a good as defined by § 355.2-105. See Lexington Mack, Inc. v. Miller, 555 S.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 355.2-105(1) — 5 cases
Real Est. Mktg., Inc. v. Franz, 885 S.W.2d 921 (Ky. 1994). “” The claim asserted under the Consumer Protection Act was denied by the trial court on grounds that “goods are defined in KRS 355.2-105(1), and a home does not fall within that definition,” and this ruling was not challenged on appeal.”
Aud v. Illinois Cent. R.R., 955 F. Supp. 757 (W.D. Ky. 1997). “The term “goods” as used in the Uniform Commercial Code is defined in KRS 355.2-105(1) as “all things ... which are movable at the time of identification to the contract for sale____” The real estate is certainly not moveable.”
Bowling Green Livestock Mkt., Inc. v. Young (In Re Clark), 206 B.R. 439 (Bankr. W.D. Ky. 1996). “KRS 355.2-105(1). The title dispute in this case centers around the registration certificates that accompany Black Angus Cattle.”
Laurel Grocery Co., L.L.C. v. Freshway, Inc. (E.D. Ky. 2019). “]” KRS 355.2-105(1). Freshway does not dispute Laurel’s contention that the subject “wholesale grocery products” fall within this definition.”
Son v. Coal Equity, Inc., 293 B.R. 392 (W.D. Ky. 2003).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.