Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 355.2-508 (2026)

Cure by seller of improper tender or delivery -- Replacement

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(1) Where any tender or delivery by the seller is rejected because nonconforming and the time for performance has not yet expired, the seller may seasonably notify the buyer of his intention to cure and may then within the contract time make a conforming delivery.

(2) Where the buyer rejects a nonconforming tender which the seller had reasonable grounds to believe would be acceptable with or without money allowance the seller may if he seasonably notifies the buyer have a further reasonable time to substitute a conforming tender. Effective: July 1, 1960 History: Created 1958 Ky. Acts ch. 77, sec. 2-508, effective July 1, 1960.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 1 case, 1988–1988 · leading case: Leitchfield Dev. Corp. v. Clark, 757 S.W.2d 207 (Ky. Ct. App. 1988).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Leitchfield Dev. Corp. v. Clark, 757 S.W.2d 207 (Ky. Ct. App. 1988). · cites it 22× “Although the parties agree that the contract in question is governed by the provisions of Article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code, they disagree as to the relationship between KRS 355.2-508 and KRS 355.2-601. Specifically, they disagree as to whether the latter statute is…”

— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 355.2-508(1) — 1 case

Leitchfield Dev. Corp. v. Clark, 757 S.W.2d 207 (Ky. Ct. App. 1988). “Although the parties agree that the contract in question is governed by the provisions of Article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code, they disagree as to the relationship between KRS 355.2-508 and KRS 355.2-601. Specifically, they disagree as to whether the latter statute is…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.