Ky. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 355
Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 355.2-606 (2026)

What constitutes acceptance of goods

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(1) Acceptance of goods occurs when the buyer

(a) after a reasonable opportunity to inspect the goods signifies to the seller that the goods are conforming or that he will take or retain them in spite of their nonconformity; or

(b) fails to make an effective rejection (subsection (1) of KRS 355.2-602), but such acceptance does not occur until the buyer has had a reasonable opportunity to inspect them; or

(c) does any act inconsistent with the seller's ownership; but if such act is wrongful as against the seller it is an acceptance only if ratified by him.

(2) Acceptance of a part of any commercial unit is acceptance of that entire unit. Effective: July 1, 1960 History: Created 1958 Ky. Acts ch. 77, sec. 2-606, effective July 1, 1960.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1976–2026 · leading case: Keck v. Wacker, 413 F. Supp. 1377 (E.D. Ky. 1976).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Keck v. Wacker, 413 F. Supp. 1377 (E.D. Ky. 1976). “2-608(2): Revocation of acceptance must occur within a reasonable time after the buyer discovers or should have discovered the ground for it and before any substantial change in condition of the goods which is not caused by their own defects.”
Lexington Mack, Inc. v. Miller, 555 S.W.2d 249 (Ky. 1977). “KRS 355.2-606 provides that acceptance occurs when the buyer “fails to make an effective rejection” or “does any act inconsistent with the seller’s ownership”.”
Powerscreen USA, LLC v. D & L Equip., Inc., 661 F. Supp. 2d 705 (W.D. Ky. 2009). “KRS 355.2-606(l)(c). Upon acceptance, the defendants were obligated to pay Powerscreen.”
Holmes (E.D. Ky. 2026). · cites it 2× “KRS § 355.2-606. The evidence in the record presents facts which no reasonable jury could find that Holmes effectively rejected the Black Ghost.”
Greene v. Waddell, 657 S.W.2d 589 (Ky. Ct. App. 1983). “Thus, while the circuit court found that appellant had accepted the vehicle under KRS 355.2-606, thereby precluding his remedies under the Uniform Commercial Code, he still has remedies under the Consumer Protection Act.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 355.2-606(l)(c) — 1 case
Powerscreen USA, LLC v. D & L Equip., Inc., 661 F. Supp. 2d 705 (W.D. Ky. 2009). “KRS 355.2-606(l)(c). Upon acceptance, the defendants were obligated to pay Powerscreen.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.