Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 378.010 (2026)

Repealed, 2016

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Catchline at repeal: Fraudulent conveyances and encumbrances -- Void as to whom -- Exception. History: Repealed 2015 Ky. Acts ch. 37, sec. 16, effective January 1, 2016. -- Recodified 1942 Ky. Acts ch. 208, sec. 1, effective October 1, 1942, from Ky. Stat. sec. 1906.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 56 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1943–2025 · leading case: Gatx Corp. v. Addington, 879 F. Supp. 2d 633 (E.D. Ky. 2012).
Gatx Corp. v. Addington, 879 F. Supp. 2d 633 (E.D. Ky. 2012). · cites it 22× “# 1) alleges that the Addington brothers participated in property conveyances with “intent to delay, hinder or defraud creditors” in violation KRS § 378.010. Count two alleges that Larry, a debtor, conveyed property of his estate without receiving valuable consideration in…”
Spradlin v. E. Coast Miner, LLC (In re Licking River Mining, LLC), 603 B.R. 336 (Bankr. E.D. Ky. 2019). · cites it 11× “§ 378.010, "which prevents transfers or conveyances 'with the intent to delay, hinder or defraud creditors.”
Spradlin ex rel. J.A.D. Coal Co. v. Pryor Cashman LLP (In re Licking River Mining, LLC), 565 B.R. 794 (Bankr. E.D. Ky. 2017). · cites it 5× “Ky. Rev. Stat. § 378.010 (emphasis added) (repealed Jan.”
Spradlin v. Monday Coal, LLC (In re Licking River Mining, LLC), 571 B.R. 241 (Bankr. E.D. Ky. 2017). · cites it 5× “Ky. Rev. Stat. § 378.010 (emphasis added).”
Bank of Kentucky, Inc. v. Nageleisen (In re Nageleisen), 523 B.R. 522 (Bankr. E.D. Ky. 2014). · cites it 8× “It then found that Debtor conveyed the Decoursey Pike property with the intent to defraud creditors in violation of and Ky. Rev. Stat. § 378.010, which voids intentionally fraudulent transfers.”
Sierra Enter. Inc. v. SWO & ISM, LLC, 264 F. Supp. 3d 826 (W.D. Ky. 2017). · cites it 4× “Fraudulent Conveyances Count XXXV of the Amended Complaint seeks damages for the actions Lewis Oil took when it received fraudulently conveyed assets in violation of KRS 378.010 and 020. (Am. Compl. ¶¶ 276-78).”
Schilling v. Carlos Montalvo Univ. Gardens II 2 (In Re Montalvo), 324 B.R. 619 (Bankr. W.D. Ky. 2005). · cites it 6× “Trustee’s claims are made pursuant to KRS 378.010, KRS 378.020, 11 U.S.C. § 544 (b), 11 U.”
Schilling v. Montalvo (In Re Montalvo), 333 B.R. 145 (Bankr. W.D. Ky. 2005). · cites it 5× “020 and KRS 378.010. In order to succeed on these claims, Trustee had to first establish the existence of a creditor holding an unsecured claim allowable under 11 U.”
CNH Capital Am. LLC v. Hunt Tractor, Inc., 568 F. App'x 461 (6th Cir. 2014). · cites it 5× “” KRS 378.010. Kentucky Revised Statute 378.”
Evans v. Armenta, 134 F. Supp. 3d 1052 (E.D. Ky. 2015). · cites it 7× “*1061 Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 378.010 (emphasis added).”
Spradlin v. Whitt (In re Licking River Mining, LLC), 572 B.R. 812 (Bankr. E.D. Ky. 2017). · cites it 4× “Ky. Rev. Stat. § 378.010. Thus, to survive a Civil Rule 12(b)(6) motion, Counts III and VII both require allegations supporting a plausible inference of the transferor’s intent to hinder, delay and defraud.”
Jadco Enter., Inc. v. Fannon, 991 F. Supp. 2d 947 (E.D. Ky. 2014). · cites it 2× “Additionally, holdings from courts outside of Kentucky are not uniform regarding the burden shifting element of the badges of fraud.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.