Kentucky Revised Statutes
Ky. Rev. Stat. § 378.010 (2026)
Repealed, 2016
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Catchline at repeal: Fraudulent conveyances and encumbrances -- Void as to whom -- Exception. History: Repealed 2015 Ky. Acts ch. 37, sec. 16, effective January 1, 2016. -- Recodified 1942 Ky. Acts ch. 208, sec. 1, effective October 1, 1942, from Ky. Stat. sec. 1906.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 56
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1943–2025 · leading case: Gatx Corp. v. Addington, 879 F. Supp. 2d 633 (E.D. Ky. 2012).
Gatx Corp. v. Addington, 879 F. Supp. 2d 633 (E.D. Ky. 2012). “# 1) alleges that the Addington brothers participated in property conveyances with “intent to delay, hinder or defraud creditors” in violation KRS § 378.010. Count two alleges that Larry, a debtor, conveyed property of his estate without receiving valuable consideration in…”
Spradlin v. E. Coast Miner, LLC (In re Licking River Mining, LLC), 603 B.R. 336 (Bankr. E.D. Ky. 2019). “§ 378.010, "which prevents transfers or conveyances 'with the intent to delay, hinder or defraud creditors.”
Spradlin ex rel. J.A.D. Coal Co. v. Pryor Cashman LLP (In re Licking River Mining, LLC), 565 B.R. 794 (Bankr. E.D. Ky. 2017). “Ky. Rev. Stat. § 378.010 (emphasis added) (repealed Jan.”
Spradlin v. Monday Coal, LLC (In re Licking River Mining, LLC), 571 B.R. 241 (Bankr. E.D. Ky. 2017). “Ky. Rev. Stat. § 378.010 (emphasis added).”
Bank of Kentucky, Inc. v. Nageleisen (In re Nageleisen), 523 B.R. 522 (Bankr. E.D. Ky. 2014). “It then found that Debtor conveyed the Decoursey Pike property with the intent to defraud creditors in violation of and Ky. Rev. Stat. § 378.010, which voids intentionally fraudulent transfers.”
Sierra Enter. Inc. v. SWO & ISM, LLC, 264 F. Supp. 3d 826 (W.D. Ky. 2017). “Fraudulent Conveyances Count XXXV of the Amended Complaint seeks damages for the actions Lewis Oil took when it received fraudulently conveyed assets in violation of KRS 378.010 and 020. (Am. Compl. ¶¶ 276-78).”
Schilling v. Carlos Montalvo Univ. Gardens II 2 (In Re Montalvo), 324 B.R. 619 (Bankr. W.D. Ky. 2005). “Trustee’s claims are made pursuant to KRS 378.010, KRS 378.020, 11 U.S.C. § 544 (b), 11 U.”
Schilling v. Montalvo (In Re Montalvo), 333 B.R. 145 (Bankr. W.D. Ky. 2005). “020 and KRS 378.010. In order to succeed on these claims, Trustee had to first establish the existence of a creditor holding an unsecured claim allowable under 11 U.”
CNH Capital Am. LLC v. Hunt Tractor, Inc., 568 F. App'x 461 (6th Cir. 2014). “” KRS 378.010. Kentucky Revised Statute 378.”
Evans v. Armenta, 134 F. Supp. 3d 1052 (E.D. Ky. 2015). “*1061 Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 378.010 (emphasis added).”
Spradlin v. Whitt (In re Licking River Mining, LLC), 572 B.R. 812 (Bankr. E.D. Ky. 2017). “Ky. Rev. Stat. § 378.010. Thus, to survive a Civil Rule 12(b)(6) motion, Counts III and VII both require allegations supporting a plausible inference of the transferor’s intent to hinder, delay and defraud.”
Jadco Enter., Inc. v. Fannon, 991 F. Supp. 2d 947 (E.D. Ky. 2014). “Additionally, holdings from courts outside of Kentucky are not uniform regarding the burden shifting element of the badges of fraud.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.