Ky. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 387
Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 387.032 (2026)

Matters to be considered by court when making appointment

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

In appointing a guardian, limited guardian, or conservator, the District Court shall appoint any person or entity whose appointment would be in the best interest of the minor, taking into consideration the ability of the person or entity to manage and preserve the minor's estate, and taking into consideration the person or entity nominated pursuant to KRS 387.040 or 387.050. Effective: July 13, 1990 History: Created 1990 Ky. Acts ch. 487, sec. 4, effective July 13, 1990.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2008–2021 · leading case: Branham v. Stewart, 307 S.W.3d 94 (Ky. 2010).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Branham v. Stewart, 307 S.W.3d 94 (Ky. 2010). · cites it 4× “025 (governing applications for appointment as a minor's guardian); KRS 387.032 (matters to be considered by court when appointing a guardian for a minor).”
Logan Coons v. Honorable Judith McDonald-burkman, No. 2020 SC 0506 (Ky. Oct. 25, 2021). · cites it 2× “, KRS 387.032 (“The District Court shall appoint any person or entity whose appointment would be in the best interest of the minor .”
McCary v. Mitchell, 260 S.W.3d 362 (Ky. Ct. App. 2008). “270, the de facto custodian provision, to a guardianship proceeding under KRS 387.032. The second is purely a factual issue, specifically, whether the district court abused its discretion when it found that the child’s best interest was served by appointing the Mitchells as…”
Ralph Gentry v. Commonwealth of Kentucky, No. 2007 SC 000250 (Ky. Mar. 18, 2010). “025 (governing applications for appointment as a minor's guardian) ; KRS 387.032 (matters to be considered by court when appointing a guardian for a minor).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.