Ky. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 425
Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 425.225 (2026)

Repealed, 1976

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Catchline at repeal: Execution of order. History: Repealed 1976 Ky. Acts ch. 91, sec. 45. -- Transferred 1952 Ky. Acts ch. 84, secs. 1 and 11, effective July 1, 1953, from C.C. sec. 203. -- C.C. sec. 203 amended 1886 ch. 1163, sec. 1.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1953–2017 · leading case: Lewis, Roca, Scoville & Beauchamp, a P'ship v. Inland Empire Ins. Co., 259 F.2d 318 (10th Cir. 1958).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Lewis, Roca, Scoville & Beauchamp, a P'ship v. Inland Empire Ins. Co., 259 F.2d 318 (10th Cir. 1958). “KRS 425.225 provides that the sheriff shall execute an order of attachment upon personal property capable of manual delivery by taking it into his custody and holding it subject to order of the court and upon other personal property by delivering a copy of the order, with a…”
Thacker v. Commonwealth, 284 S.W.2d 325 (Ky. Ct. App. 1955). “The record contains no evidence showing that the levying officer obtained possession of the car, as required by KRS 425.225(2). Therefore, Thacker’s conviction under KRS 434.”
French v. Sec. Seed & Chem., Inc., 259 F. Supp. 3d 671 (W.D. Ky. 2017). · cites it 2× “However, the authorities relied upon by the Bankruptcy Court only tangentially address the situation at hand and the relevant statutes.”
Gibson v. Auxier, 264 S.W.2d 286 (Ky. Ct. App. 1953). “203, Civil Code of Practice (now KRS 425.225). Sec. 51 of the Civil Code of Practice provided that in an action against a private corporation the summons should be served “upon the defendant’s chief officer or agent who may be found” in the county.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 425.225(2) — 1 case
Thacker v. Commonwealth, 284 S.W.2d 325 (Ky. Ct. App. 1955). “The record contains no evidence showing that the levying officer obtained possession of the car, as required by KRS 425.225(2). Therefore, Thacker’s conviction under KRS 434.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.