Ky. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 434
Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 434.210 (2026)

Repealed, effective January 1, 1975

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Catchline at repeal: Fraudulent concealment or removal of mortgaged personal property. History: Repealed 1974 Ky. Acts ch. 406, sec. 336, effective January 1, 1975. -- Amended 1942 Ky. Acts ch. 192, sec. 1. -- Recodified 1942 Ky. Acts ch. 208, sec. 1, effective October 1, 1942, from Ky. Stat. sec. 1358.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1951–1965 · leading case: Smith v. Kidd, 246 S.W.2d 155 (Ky. Ct. App. 1951).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Smith v. Kidd, 246 S.W.2d 155 (Ky. Ct. App. 1951). · cites it 2× “The statute under which Lawrence Kidd was arrested, KRS 434.210, makes it a crime to fraudulently sell, conceal, dispose of, or knowingly remove from the state, any personal property on which there is a lien, with intent to prevent or hinder the enforcement of the lien.”
Thacker v. Commonwealth, 284 S.W.2d 325 (Ky. Ct. App. 1955). · cites it 2× “KRS 434.210, under which Thacker was convicted, requires that the property be subject to a statutory lien when it is removed from the State.”
Sims v. Commonwealth, 260 S.W.2d 393 (Ky. Ct. App. 1953). “The appellant, Herman Sims, was found guilty of selling mortgaged property in violation of KRS 434.210 and sentenced to 3 years in prison.”
First Nat. Bank of Louisville v. Walling, 264 S.W.2d 876 (Ky. Ct. App. 1954). · cites it 2× “The bank’s chief ground for reversal is that since Karem prepared and had Walling execute the affidavit, that all the property sold the Mitchells belonged to Walling and was free from encumbrance, Karem is now estopped from himself claiming title to the restaurant fixtures.”
Lucas v. Commonwealth, 255 S.W.2d 609 (Ky. Ct. App. 1953). “See KRS 434.210. His punishment was fixed at one year’s imprisonment in the penitentiary.”
In re Hall, 248 F. Supp. 124 (E.D. Ky. 1965). “The petitioner defends his actions by stating that he acted upon a good faith belief that if he had sold the automobile for his clients in order to pay the filing fees, he and they would have violated KRS 434.210. After the institution of these proceedings, the trustee could…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.