Louisiana Revised Statutes & Codes

La. Rev. Stat. § 32:718 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section LA-LEGlegis.la.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

§718. Sale of an auto hulk as scrap to a scrap metal processor or a licensed automotive dismantler and parts recycler

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 10 cases, 1977–2018 · leading case: Richard Boudreaux v. Pat Puckett, D/B/A Pat Puckett Auto Sales, W. Sur. Co., 611 F.2d 1028 (5th Cir. 1980).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Richard Boudreaux v. Pat Puckett, D/B/A Pat Puckett Auto Sales, W. Sur. Co., 611 F.2d 1028 (5th Cir. 1980). · cites it 2× “R.S. 32:718(D). This statute provides that, as a condition precedent to dealing in automobiles, the bond must be posted in favor of the state Motor Vehicle Commissioner for the use and benefit of third parties injured under certain conditions specified in the statute.”

Boudreaux v. Puckett, 433 F. Supp. 650 (E.D. La. 1977). · cites it 2× “Such bond shall be payable to the Commissioner and to his successors in office, for the use, benefit, and indemnity of any persons who shall suffer any loss as a result of any violations of the conditions herein-above contained.”

Daigle v. Oakwood Homes, Inc., 460 So. 2d 51 (La. Ct. App. 1984). · cites it 3× “The conditions of the bond, executed in conformity with LSA-R.S. 32:718(D) [2] , are as follows: [The dealer] shall fully comply with the conditions of any written contract made by him as such dealer in connection with the sale or exchange of any motor vehicle; and shall pay or…”

State v. Barnett, 389 So. 2d 352 (La. 1980). “In such a parish, this Section shall not be construed as applying to dealers in motor vehicles, dealers in used parts or used accessories of motor vehicles or wreckers or dismantlers of motor vehicles who are licensed under the provisions of R.S. 32:718 et seq. § 1862. License…”

Ashley v. Volkswagen of Am., Inc., 380 So. 2d 702 (La. Ct. App. 1980). “The conditions of the bond, which was executed in conformity with the requirement for a dealership under R.S. 32:718(D), is that the dealer "... shall fully comply with the conditions of any written contract made by him as such dealer in connection with the sale or exchanges of…”

Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. Little Ford, Inc., 522 So. 2d 1124 (La. Ct. App. 1988). “LSA-R.S. 32:718 A., prior to its repeal by La.”

Terry v. Guillory, 538 So. 2d 317 (La. Ct. App. 1989). · cites it 7× “NOTES [1] R.S. 32:718 was subsequently repealed by Acts 1984, No.”

Price v. Piotrowski, 632 So. 2d 1 (La. Ct. App. 1994). “LSA-R.S. 32:718(D) (repealed)). Accordingly, for the reasons herein represented, the judgment of the trial court is reversed.”

Crumpton v. Smith, 256 So. 3d 1112 (La. Ct. App. 2018). “R.S. 32:718, originally enacted by Acts 2008, No.”

in Re: Thomas Lytle & Ellen Lytle (Tex. App. 2015). “LSA-R.S. 32:718, that: (1) factors to be considered as to subd.”

— La. Rev. Stat. § 32:718(D) — 6 cases

Richard Boudreaux v. Pat Puckett, D/B/A Pat Puckett Auto Sales, W. Sur. Co., 611 F.2d 1028 (5th Cir. 1980). “R.S. 32:718(D). This statute provides that, as a condition precedent to dealing in automobiles, the bond must be posted in favor of the state Motor Vehicle Commissioner for the use and benefit of third parties injured under certain conditions specified in the statute.”

Daigle v. Oakwood Homes, Inc., 460 So. 2d 51 (La. Ct. App. 1984). “The conditions of the bond, executed in conformity with LSA-R.S. 32:718(D) [2] , are as follows: [The dealer] shall fully comply with the conditions of any written contract made by him as such dealer in connection with the sale or exchange of any motor vehicle; and shall pay or…”

Boudreaux v. Puckett, 433 F. Supp. 650 (E.D. La. 1977). “Such bond shall be payable to the Commissioner and to his successors in office, for the use, benefit, and indemnity of any persons who shall suffer any loss as a result of any violations of the conditions herein-above contained.”

Terry v. Guillory, 538 So. 2d 317 (La. Ct. App. 1989). “NOTES [1] R.S. 32:718 was subsequently repealed by Acts 1984, No.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.