La. R.S. » RS
Louisiana Revised Statutes & Codes

La. Rev. Stat. § 9:422.6 (2026)

Repealed by Acts 1991, No. 235, §17, eff. January. 1, 1992.

✓ laws through the 2025 Regular Session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section LA-LEGlegis.la.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

§422.6. Repealed by Acts 1991, No. 235, §17, eff. January. 1, 1992.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 25 cases, 1981–2013 · leading case: In re Go Applying for Adoption, 433 So. 2d 1115 (La. Ct. App. 1983).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In re Go Applying for Adoption, 433 So. 2d 1115 (La. Ct. App. 1983). · cites it 6× “The issues presented on appeal are: (1) whether the formal act of surrender complied with the requirements of LSA-R.S. 9:422.6; (2) whether the act of surrender was executed subsequent to the period of delay provided by LSA-R.”
In re CDT, 415 So. 2d 315 (La. Ct. App. 1982). · cites it 4× “The respondent-mother argues that no valid consent was given under either LSA-R.S. 9:422.6 or 9:429, [2] and alternatively if consent was found that she withdrew her consent prior to the rendition of an interlocutory decree.”
Wuertz v. Craig, 458 So. 2d 1311 (La. 1985). · cites it 3× “Craig's address was not on the act of surrender as required by R.S. 9:422.6. Soon after this meeting, Ms.”
In re JMP, 528 So. 2d 1002 (La. 1988). · cites it 4× “R.S. 9:422.6, as worded at the time that the act of surrender was executed, required a recitation that "the parent or parents freely and voluntarily surrender custody of the child," and "that the parent or parents have been informed and understand that their rights as parent of…”
Olivier v. Nat'l Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, 499 So. 2d 1330 (La. Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 2× “R.S. 9:422.6, and forwarded same by mail to the Oliviers with instructions that an attorney would have to be retained to represent Segura, the natural mother.”
A.S. v. M.C., 685 So. 2d 644 (La. Ct. App. 1996). · cites it 12× “alleged that the Concurrence was not in authentic form and that she was not advised by an attorney other than the attorney for the prospective adoptive parents, as required by the amendment to LSA-R.S. 9:422.6, effective July 9, 1987.”
Durr v. Blue, 454 So. 2d 315 (La. Ct. App. 1984). · cites it 2× “4, no strict compliance with the requirements of the act of surrender set out in LSA-R.S. 9:422.6, and no service of notice of the filing of the adoption petition on each living parent required by LSA-R.”
In re J.M.P., 528 So. 2d 1002 (La. 1988). · cites it 3× “R.S. 9:422.6, as worded at the time that the act of surrender was executed, required a recitation that “the parent or parents freely and voluntarily surrender custody of the child,” and “that the parent or parents have been informed and understand that their rights as parent of…”
In re RLV, 484 So. 2d 206 (La. Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 3× “The Trial Judge dismissed SRP's opposition based on the Act's alleged deficiencies, finding that "the act of surrender is [in] substantial compliance with R.S. 9:422.6," reasoning, in part, "it is immaterial that the address of the person to whom the surrender was made was .”
M.P.W. v. L.P.W., 136 So. 3d 37 (La. Ct. App. 2013). “R.S. 9:422.6(A), which provisions are now set forth in La.”
In re C.A.P., 573 So. 2d 214 (La. Ct. App. 1990). · cites it 8× “R.S. 9:422.6. However, the court declared it to be a valid notarial surrender pursuant to La.”
In re Simon, 406 So. 2d 266 (La. Ct. App. 1981). · cites it 2× “Specifically, he alleges that the formal act of voluntary surrender executed by Andrea's mother in favor of appellees fails to set forth all of the information required by LSA-R.S. 9:422.6. [3] We agree that the document is deficient.”
Show all 25 citing cases →
La. Rev. Stat. § 9:422.6(11): 1 case
Dignam v. Hall, 761 So. 2d 648 (La. Ct. App. 2000).
La. Rev. Stat. § 9:422.6(2): 1 case
In re JMP, 528 So. 2d 1002 (La. 1988). “R.S. 9:422.6, as worded at the time that the act of surrender was executed, required a recitation that "the parent or parents freely and voluntarily surrender custody of the child," and "that the parent or parents have been informed and understand that their rights as parent of…”
La. Rev. Stat. § 9:422.6(3): 1 case
Olivier v. Nat'l Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, 499 So. 2d 1330 (La. Ct. App. 1986). “R.S. 9:422.6, and forwarded same by mail to the Oliviers with instructions that an attorney would have to be retained to represent Segura, the natural mother.”
La. Rev. Stat. § 9:422.6(A): 1 case
M.P.W. v. L.P.W., 136 So. 3d 37 (La. Ct. App. 2013). “R.S. 9:422.6(A), which provisions are now set forth in La.”
La. Rev. Stat. § 9:422.6(A)(11): 3 cases
A.S. v. M.C., 685 So. 2d 644 (La. Ct. App. 1996). “alleged that the Concurrence was not in authentic form and that she was not advised by an attorney other than the attorney for the prospective adoptive parents, as required by the amendment to LSA-R.S. 9:422.6, effective July 9, 1987.”
As v. Mc, 685 So. 2d 644 (La. Ct. App. 1996).
In re JWR, 607 So. 2d 634 (La. Ct. App. 1992).
La. Rev. Stat. § 9:422.6(B): 2 cases
A.S. v. M.C., 685 So. 2d 644 (La. Ct. App. 1996). “alleged that the Concurrence was not in authentic form and that she was not advised by an attorney other than the attorney for the prospective adoptive parents, as required by the amendment to LSA-R.S. 9:422.6, effective July 9, 1987.”
As v. Mc, 685 So. 2d 644 (La. Ct. App. 1996).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.