Louisiana Revised Statutes & Codes

La. Rev. Stat. § 9:4521 (2026)

Repealed by Acts 2010, No. 378, §4.

✓ laws through the 2025 Regular Session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section LA-LEGlegis.la.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

PART II.  CROPS

§4521. Repealed by Acts 2010, No. 378, §4.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases, 1973–2001 · leading case: First Nat. Bank v. Beckwith Mach. Co., 650 So. 2d 1148 (La. 1995).
First Nat. Bank v. Beckwith Mach. Co., 650 So. 2d 1148 (La. 1995). · cites it 3× “R.S. 9:4521 supports this proposition. That statute provides, as an express exception to the priority rule of § 10:9-201, that certain statutory privileges granted therein shall have priority over a perfected Chapter 9 security interest.”
Bayou Pierre Farms v. Bat Farms Partners, III, 676 So. 2d 643 (La. Ct. App. 1996). · cites it 18× “R.S. 9:4521. Bayou Pierre was ranked first, T.”
Henry v. Pioneer Sweet Potato Co., Inc., 614 So. 2d 853 (La. Ct. App. 1993). · cites it 9× “However, LSA-R.S. 9:4521 as it read at all times pertinent provided as follows: The privileges and pledges on crops shall be ranked in the following order of preference, provided that notice thereof has been properly filed and maintained in R.”
Deposit Guar. Nat'l Bank v. Cent. Louisiana Grain Co-Op, Inc., 737 So. 2d 167 (La. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 17× “R.S. 9:4521 and [La.]R.S. 3:3651 et seq. to perfect his lien in farm products to be given priority over a prior perfected security interest? |a3.”
Bayou Pierre Farms v. Bat Farms Partners, 693 So. 2d 1158 (La. 1997). · cites it 36× “R.S. 9:4521 and La.C.C. art. 3217 and would thus be ranked as the first privilege on the funds derived from the sale of that cotton now on deposit in the registry of the court.”
Meyhoeffer v. Wallace, 792 So. 2d 851 (La. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 3× “R.S. 9:4521, which provides that the lessor's privilege outranks a perfected security interest only when the lessor's privilege is properly filed and maintained in accordance with the central registry provisions of La.”
Howard v. Stokes, 607 So. 2d 868 (La. Ct. App. 1992). · cites it 15× “DISCUSSION The proper ranking of the three security interests at issue rests upon the *870 meaning of the provisions of LSA-R.S. 9:4521, which at times pertinent to this litigation provided: The privileges and pledges on crops shall be ranked in the following order of…”
McGill v. Griffith, 273 So. 2d 366 (La. Ct. App. 1973). · cites it 3× “3217(1), as permitted under LSA-R.S. 9:4521. The crop privilege and lien which is attached to the petition, recited that the lien existed even though unrecorded and “ .”
Pelican Prod. Credit Ass'n v. Ruth J. Coco (In re Schexnyder), 46 B.R. 260 (W.D. La. 1984). · cites it 2× “R.S. 9:4521 has been amended by Act 1950, No.”
La. Rev. Stat. § 9:4521(1): 1 case
Bayou Pierre Farms v. Bat Farms Partners, 693 So. 2d 1158 (La. 1997). “R.S. 9:4521 and La.C.C. art. 3217 and would thus be ranked as the first privilege on the funds derived from the sale of that cotton now on deposit in the registry of the court.”
La. Rev. Stat. § 9:4521(2): 1 case
Bayou Pierre Farms v. Bat Farms Partners, 693 So. 2d 1158 (La. 1997). “R.S. 9:4521 and La.C.C. art. 3217 and would thus be ranked as the first privilege on the funds derived from the sale of that cotton now on deposit in the registry of the court.”
La. Rev. Stat. § 9:4521(3): 2 cases
Bayou Pierre Farms v. Bat Farms Partners, III, 676 So. 2d 643 (La. Ct. App. 1996). “R.S. 9:4521. Bayou Pierre was ranked first, T.”
Bayou Pierre Farms v. Bat Farms Partners, 693 So. 2d 1158 (La. 1997). “R.S. 9:4521 and La.C.C. art. 3217 and would thus be ranked as the first privilege on the funds derived from the sale of that cotton now on deposit in the registry of the court.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.