Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 12
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 12, § 7857 (2026)

Prohibited acts

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1983, c. 297, §§1,3 (NEW). PL 1983, c. 797, §13 (AMD). PL 1985, c. 369, §§24,25 (AMD). PL 1985, c. 762, §§11-22 (AMD). PL 1987, c. 317, §25 (AMD). PL 1989, c. 493, §§66-72 (AMD). PL 1989, c. 502, §B11 (AMD). PL 1989, c. 689 (AMD). PL 1989, c. 913, §§A17,B14 (AMD). PL 1991, c. 443, §§37,38 (AMD). PL 1991, c. 528, §E9 (AMD). PL 1991, c. 528, §RRR (AFF). PL 1991, c. 591, §E9 (AMD). PL 1993, c. 26, §1 (AMD). PL 1993, c. 438, §§39-41 (AMD). PL 1995, c. 65, §§A34-36 (AMD). PL 1995, c. 65, §§A153,C15 (AFF). PL 1995, c. 455, §§42,43 (AMD). PL 1995, c. 679, §§9,10 (AMD). PL 1997, c. 219, §§1-3 (AMD). PL 1997, c. 432, §§55,56 (AMD). PL 1999, c. 310, §1 (AMD). PL 2001, c. 289, §1 (AMD). PL 2001, c. 387, §§41-43 (AMD). PL 2001, c. 421, §B86 (AMD). PL 2001, c. 421, §C1 (AFF). PL 2003, c. 414, §A1 (RP). PL 2003, c. 414, §D7 (AFF). PL 2003, c. 614, §9 (AFF). PL 2003, c. 695, §A1 (AMD).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1998–2000 · leading case: State v. Cilley, 1998 ME 34, 707 A.2d 79.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Cilley, 1998 ME 34, 707 A.2d 79. · cites it 3× “12 M.R.S.A. § 7857 provides in pertinent part: 5.”
Wallace v. Moore, No. WALre-99-011 (Me. Super. Ct June 12, 2000). “”); 12 M.R.S.A. § 7857(3) (1994) (“A person is guilty of unlawfully operating a vehicle on a snowmobile trail, .”
Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 12, § 7857(10): 1 case
State v. Cilley, 1998 ME 34, 707 A.2d 79. “12 M.R.S.A. § 7857 provides in pertinent part: 5.”
Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 12, § 7857(3): 1 case
Wallace v. Moore, No. WALre-99-011 (Me. Super. Ct June 12, 2000). “”); 12 M.R.S.A. § 7857(3) (1994) (“A person is guilty of unlawfully operating a vehicle on a snowmobile trail, .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.