Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 15
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 15, § 2115 (2026)

Appeals from the Superior Court

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
In any criminal proceeding in the Superior Court, any defendant aggrieved by a judgment of conviction, ruling or order may appeal to the Supreme Judicial Court sitting as the Law Court. The Supreme Judicial Court shall provide by rule the time for taking the appeal and the manner and any conditions for the taking of the appeal.   [PL 1999, c. 731, Pt. ZZZ, §17 (AMD); PL 1999, c. 731, Pt. ZZZ, §42 (AFF).]
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1965, c. 356, §63 (RPR). PL 1987, c. 166, §3 (AMD). PL 1999, c. 731, §ZZZ17 (AMD). PL 1999, c. 731, §ZZZ42 (AFF). PL 2007, c. 475, §5 (AMD).
The Revisor's Office cannot provide legal advice or interpretation of Maine law to the public.
If you need legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 256 cases (56 in the last 5 years), 1969–2026 · leading case: State Ex Rel. Franklin v. Mcbride, 701 S.E.2d 97 (W. Va. 2009).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State Ex Rel. Franklin v. Mcbride, 701 S.E.2d 97 (W. Va. 2009). “02 (Lexis 2009); Me.Rev.Stat. Ann. tit. 15, § 2115 (West 2003); Md.”
State of Maine v. Lyanne Lemeunier-Fitzgerald, 2018 ME 85 (Me. 2018). · cites it 2× “See 15 M.R.S. § 2115 (2017); M.R. App. P. 2(b)(2)(A) (Tower 2016).”
State of Maine v. Victoria Scott, 2019 ME 105 (Me. 2019). · cites it 2× “See 15 M.R.S. § 2115 (2018); M.R. App. P. 2B(b)(1).”
State v. Bailey, 2012 ME 55 (Me. 2012). · cites it 2× “Bailey appeals the court's judgment pursuant to 15 M.R.S. § 2115 (2011) and M.R.App. P. 2.”
State of Maine v. John M. Burbank, 2019 ME 37 (Me. 2019). · cites it 2× “See 15 M.R.S. § 2115 (2018). II. LEGAL ANALYSIS [¶6] Burbank first asserts that the court erred by excluding the testimony of the first witness based on its alternative conclusions, cast as foundational matters, that she was not sufficiently qualified to render expert testimony…”
State v. Cook, 2010 ME 85 (Me. 2010). · cites it 3× “All sentences were to be served concurrently.”
State of Maine v. John E. Sasso, 2016 ME 95 (Me. 2016). “The court found Sasso guilty and sentenced him to the mandatory seven days in jail to be satisfied by completion of ten days in an alternative sentencing program, a $600 fine, and a one-year license suspension.”
State of Maine v. Eric Nobles, 2018 ME 26 (Me. 2018). “See 15 M.R.S. § 2115 (2017) ; M.R. App. P. 2 (Tower 2016).”
State of Maine v. Wai Chan, 2020 ME 91 (Me. 2020). “7 See 15 M.R.S. § 2115 (2020); M.R. App. P. 2B(b)(1).”
State of Maine v. Dana P. Lajoie, 2017 ME 8 (Me. 2017). “2(b)(2)(A) and 15 M.R.S. § 2115 (2016). II. LEGAL ANALYSIS A.”
State of Maine v. Rondon Athayde, 2022 ME 41 (Me. 2022). “15 M.R.S. §§ 2115, 2151-2152 (2022); M.R.”
State of Maine v. Abdiaziz Hussein, 2019 ME 74 (Me. 2019). · cites it 2× “00 for assault, seven days in jail—to run concurrently with the ten days—for refusing to submit to arrest, and twenty hours of public service for refusing to sign the criminal summons.”
Show all 256 citing cases →
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 15, § 2115(2009) — 1 case
State v. Cook, 2010 ME 85 (Me. 2010). “All sentences were to be served concurrently.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.