Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 15
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 15, § 2661 (2026)

Review or appeal

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1967, c. 188 (AMD). PL 1969, c. 501, §3 (AMD). PL 1975, c. 538, §8 (AMD). PL 1977, c. 520, §18 (RP).
The Revisor's Office cannot provide legal advice or interpretation of Maine law to the public.
If you need legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1974–1978 · leading case: State v. Knowles, 371 A.2d 624 (Me. 1977).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Knowles, 371 A.2d 624 (Me. 1977). · cites it 2× “A careful examination of 15 M.R.S.A. § 2661, subd. 1, the statute authorizing review of findings of the juvenile court, persuades us to reject each of defendant’s above-stated contentions.”
State v. Alley, 385 A.2d 1175 (Me. 1978). “15 M.R.S.A. § 2661(1) provides: “The Justice of the Superior or of the Supreme Judicial Court shall in no manner be bound by the finding of the juvenile court but shall hear the matter de novo.”
State v. L D, 320 A.2d 885 (Me. 1974). “15 M.R.S.A. § 2661 et seq. The standard of review in such appeals is established by 15 M.”
State v. Corliss, 379 A.2d 998 (Me. 1977). “15 M.R.S.A. § 2661 (1964). . Contrast § 3101(4)(A) and (B) of the Maine Juvenile Code, enacted by P.”
State v. L D, 320 A.2d 885 (Me. 1974). “15 M.R.S.A. § 2661 et seq. The standard of review in such appeals is established by 15 M.”
State v. L D, 320 A.2d 885 (Me. 1974). “15 M.R.S.A. § 2661 et seq. The standard of review in such appeals is established by 15 M.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 15, § 2661(1) — 1 case
State v. Alley, 385 A.2d 1175 (Me. 1978). “15 M.R.S.A. § 2661(1) provides: “The Justice of the Superior or of the Supreme Judicial Court shall in no manner be bound by the finding of the juvenile court but shall hear the matter de novo.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.