Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 16
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 16, § 645 (2026)

Use of content information obtained in violation of this subchapter not admissible

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Except as proof of a violation of this subchapter, evidence obtained in violation of this subchapter is not admissible in a criminal, civil, administrative or other proceeding.   [PL 2013, c. 402, §1 (NEW).]
Revisor's Note: §645. Conditions of use of location information (As enacted by PL 2013, c. 409, §1 is REALLOCATED TO TITLE 16, SECTION 650-A)
SECTION HISTORY
RR 2013, c. 1, §32 (RAL). PL 2013, c. 402, §1 (NEW). PL 2013, c. 409, §1 (NEW).
The Revisor's Office cannot provide legal advice or interpretation of Maine law to the public.
If you need legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2016–2016 · leading case: State of Maine v. Evans (Me. Super. Ct 2016).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State of Maine v. Evans (Me. Super. Ct 2016). · cites it 3× “Conclusions of Law Defendant brings this motion seeking to suppress all content discovered on Defendant's cell phone pursuant to 16 M.R.S. § 645. Defendant argues that the search of content on his cell phone following its seizure is governed by Maine Revised Statutes Title 16,…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.