Maine Revised Statutes
Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 16, § 645 (2026)
Use of content information obtained in violation of this subchapter not admissible
✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Except as proof of a violation of this subchapter, evidence obtained in violation of this subchapter is not admissible in a criminal, civil, administrative or other proceeding.
[PL 2013, c. 402, §1 (NEW).]
Revisor's Note:
§645. Conditions of use of location information (As enacted by PL 2013, c. 409, §1 is REALLOCATED TO TITLE 16, SECTION 650-A)
SECTION HISTORY
RR 2013, c. 1, §32 (RAL). PL 2013, c. 402, §1 (NEW). PL 2013, c. 409, §1 (NEW).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1
case, 2016–2016 · leading case: State of Maine v. Evans, No. KENcr-16-0927 (Me. Super. Ct Oct. 31, 2016).
State of Maine v. Evans, No. KENcr-16-0927 (Me. Super. Ct Oct. 31, 2016). “Conclusions of Law Defendant brings this motion seeking to suppress all content discovered on Defendant's cell phone pursuant to 16 M.R.S. § 645. Defendant argues that the search of content on his cell phone following its seizure is governed by Maine Revised Statutes Title 16,…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.