Maine Revised Statutes
Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 17, § 101 (2026)
Penalty; cohabitation after divorce
✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1975, c. 499, §5 (RP).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1970–2025 · leading case: George Rundlett v. Richard Oliver, 607 F.2d 495 (1st Cir. 1979).
George Rundlett v. Richard Oliver, 607 F.2d 495 (1st Cir. 1979). “By contrast, a female would escape such sanction from engaging in sexual intercourse with a male under fourteen years of age, unless the state chose to impose criminal liability upon her for adultery (if she were married) pursuant to 17 M.R.S.A. § 101 (repealed effective May 1,…”
State v. Patterson, 2025-Ohio-280, 262 N.E.3d 595. “§§ 14:19 through 14:22; Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 17, §§ 101 through 108; Mich.”
Collett v. Bither, 262 A.2d 353 (Me. 1970). “” We surmise that appellant’s objections more specifically raise the following issue: Will the answers to the reference questions tend to establish that the defendant was guilty of adultery or criminal conversation with the plaintiff’s wife under 17 M.R.S.A. § 101? Although the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.