Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 17-A
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 17-A, § 1055 (2026)

Possession or distribution of dangerous knives

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1975, c. 499, §1 (NEW). PL 2011, c. 31, §1 (AMD). PL 2011, c. 464, §18 (AMD). PL 2015, c. 23, §1 (RP).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1991–2014 · leading case: State v. Johnson, 2014 ME 83, 95 A.3d 621.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Johnson, 2014 ME 83, 95 A.3d 621. · cites it 3× “§ 15-A(2) (2013), possession or distribution of dangerous knives (Class D), 17-A M.R.S. § 1055(1), (2) (2013), and refusing to submit to arrest or detention (Class D), 17-A M.”
State v. Michael M., 2001 ME 92, 772 A.2d 1179. · cites it 2× “17-A M.R.S.A. § 1055 (1983) prohibits trafficking in dangerous knives, a Class D offense: A person is guilty of trafficking in dangerous knives, if providing he has no right to do so, he .”
State v. Jones, 2012 ME 88, 46 A.3d 1125. “…or is ejected into position by the force of gravity, or by an outward, downward or centrifugal thrust or movement. 17-A M.R.S. § 1055(1) (2011).”
State v. Riddall, 811 P.2d 576 (N.M. Ct. App. 1991). “§ 21-4201 (1988); Me.Rev. Stat.Ann. tit. 17-A, § 1055(1) (1983); Wash.”
Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 17-A, § 1055(1): 4 cases
State v. Johnson, 2014 ME 83, 95 A.3d 621. “§ 15-A(2) (2013), possession or distribution of dangerous knives (Class D), 17-A M.R.S. § 1055(1), (2) (2013), and refusing to submit to arrest or detention (Class D), 17-A M.”
State v. Jones, 2012 ME 88, 46 A.3d 1125. “…or is ejected into position by the force of gravity, or by an outward, downward or centrifugal thrust or movement. 17-A M.R.S. § 1055(1) (2011).”
State v. Michael M., 2001 ME 92, 772 A.2d 1179. “17-A M.R.S.A. § 1055 (1983) prohibits trafficking in dangerous knives, a Class D offense: A person is guilty of trafficking in dangerous knives, if providing he has no right to do so, he .”
State v. Riddall, 811 P.2d 576 (N.M. Ct. App. 1991). “§ 21-4201 (1988); Me.Rev. Stat.Ann. tit. 17-A, § 1055(1) (1983); Wash.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.