Maine Revised Statutes
Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 17-A, § 1107 (2026)
Unlawful possession of scheduled drugs
✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1975, c. 499, §1 (NEW). PL 1977, c. 649, §6 (AMD). PL 1981, c. 317, §24 (AMD). PL 1989, c. 384, §4 (AMD). PL 1989, c. 538, §§3,4 (AMD). PL 1995, c. 635, §6 (AMD). PL 1999, c. 422, §10 (AMD). PL 2001, c. 383, §126 (RP). PL 2001, c. 383, §156 (AFF).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 36
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1980–2024 · leading case: State of Maine v. Daniel A. Fox, 2017 ME 52, 157 A.3d 778.
State of Maine v. Daniel A. Fox, 2017 ME 52, 157 A.3d 778. “§ 1103(1-A)(A), unlawful possession of scheduled drugs (heroin) (Class C), 17-A M.R.S. § 1107~A(1)(B)(1), unlawful possession of scheduled drugs (clonazepam) (Class E), 17-A M.”
State v. Langlois, 2005 ME 3, 863 A.2d 913. “Title 17-A M.R.S.A. § 1107 has since been repealed by P.”
State v. Guyette, 2012 ME 9, 36 A.3d 916. “) following a jury verdict finding him guilty of unlawful possession of scheduled drugs (Class C), 17-A M.R.S. § 1107 — A(1)(B)(4) (2011). 1 Guyette argues that the court erred by admitting several statements at trial pursuant to the M.”
Dawkins v. State, 547 A.2d 1041 (Md. 1988). “See also, Me.Rev.Stat.Ann. tit. 17-A § 1107(1) (1964).”
State v. McGowan, 541 A.2d 1301 (Me. 1988). “McGowan appeals from a judgment entered by the Superior Court, Cumberland County, on a jury verdict convicting him of unlawful possession of a schedule W drug (cocaine), 17-A M.R.S.A. § 1107 (1983). On appeal, McGowan contends that (1) there was insufficient evidence to prove he…”
State v. Storey, 1998 ME 161, 713 A.2d 331. “11(a)(2), of his conditional guilty plea to unlawful possession of schedule X drugs (Class D), in -violation of 17-A M.R.S.A § 1107 (Supp.1997). 1 Storey contends that the District Court (Calais, Ro-mei, J.”
State v. Pelletier, 2001 ME 173, 786 A.2d 609. “§ 2411(1)(B) & (5)(B) (1996); Count 2: Unlawful Possession of Scheduled Drug, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 1107(1) & (2)(B) (1983); and Count 3: Civil Possession of Marijuana, 22 M.”
State v. Nason, 433 A.2d 424 (Me. 1981). “He contends that to read the definition of contraband as including scheduled drugs, the possession of which is independently criminal under 17-A M.R.S.A. § 1107, is contrary to legislative intent.”
State v. May, 608 A.2d 772 (Me. 1992). “), on his conditional guilty plea, of unlawful possession of a scheduled drug, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 1107 (Supp.1991). The sole issue on appeal is whether the District Court (Rockland, Wescott, J.”
State v. Nichols, 1997 ME 178, 698 A.2d 521. “) on jury verdicts finding him guilty of the possession of a schedule W drug (Class B), 17-A M.R.S.A. § 1107 (Supp.1996); aggravated trafficking in a schedule W drug (Class A), 17-A M.”
State v. Thornton, 414 A.2d 229 (Me. 1980). “A jury found both defendants guilty of trafficking in hashish and amphetamines, furnishing marijuana, and possession of mescaline (17-A M.R.S.A. § 1107). The defendants appeal the judgments of conviction entered upon those jury verdicts.”
State v. Bonney, 427 A.2d 467 (Me. 1981). “17-A M.R.S.A. § 1107. The sufficiency of the evidence underlying Bonney’s conviction hinges on our interpretation of the statutory phrase “useable amount.”
Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 17-A, § 1107(1): 4 cases
State v. Langlois, 2005 ME 3, 863 A.2d 913. “Title 17-A M.R.S.A. § 1107 has since been repealed by P.”
Dawkins v. State, 547 A.2d 1041 (Md. 1988). “See also, Me.Rev.Stat.Ann. tit. 17-A § 1107(1) (1964).”
State v. Pelletier, 2001 ME 173, 786 A.2d 609. “§ 2411(1)(B) & (5)(B) (1996); Count 2: Unlawful Possession of Scheduled Drug, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 1107(1) & (2)(B) (1983); and Count 3: Civil Possession of Marijuana, 22 M.”
State v. Hardy, 651 A.2d 322 (Me. 1994).
Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 17-A, § 1107(2)(C): 1 case
State v. Hayford, 412 A.2d 987 (Me. 1980).
Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 17-A, § 1107(A)(1)(C): 1 case
State of Maine v. Torres-Cruz, No. CUMcr-17-03516 (Me. Super. Ct Feb. 13, 2018).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.