Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 17-A
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 17-A, § 1176 (2026)

Confidentiality of victim records

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 2005, c. 389, §1 (NEW). PL 2007, c. 475, §13 (RPR). PL 2015, c. 431, §39 (AMD). PL 2019, c. 113, Pt. A, §1 (RP).
The Revisor's Office cannot provide legal advice or interpretation of Maine law to the public.
If you need legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2012–2014 · leading case: MaineToday Media, Inc. v. Maine State Police (Me. Super. Ct 2014).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Doe v. Slattery (Me. Super. Ct 2012). “If the persons charged with engaging a prostitute are also persons who are alleged victims of the criminal charges of invasion of privacy, then their addresses should be confidential under 17-A M.R.S. § 1176(1). Counsel for plaintiffs argues that the same statute should also…”
Cuso Mortg. Corp. v. Gauthier (Me. Super. Ct 2012). “If the persons charged with engaging a prostitute are also persons who are alleged victims of the criminal charges of invasion of privacy, then their addresses should be confidential under 17-A M.R.S. § 1176(1). Counsel for plaintiffs argues that the same statute should also…”
MaineToday Media, Inc. v. Maine State Police (Me. Super. Ct 2014). “§§ 90-B, 3360-M, 4656; 17-A M.R.S. § 1176, 1177; 24 M.R.S. § 2986; 25 M.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 17-A, § 1176(1) — 2 cases
Doe v. Slattery (Me. Super. Ct 2012). “If the persons charged with engaging a prostitute are also persons who are alleged victims of the criminal charges of invasion of privacy, then their addresses should be confidential under 17-A M.R.S. § 1176(1). Counsel for plaintiffs argues that the same statute should also…”
Cuso Mortg. Corp. v. Gauthier (Me. Super. Ct 2012). “If the persons charged with engaging a prostitute are also persons who are alleged victims of the criminal charges of invasion of privacy, then their addresses should be confidential under 17-A M.R.S. § 1176(1). Counsel for plaintiffs argues that the same statute should also…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.