Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 17-A, § 1204 (2026)

Conditions of probation

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(REPEALED)

SECTION HISTORY

PL 1975, c. 499, §1 (NEW). PL 1975, c. 740, §§110,110-A (AMD). PL 1977, c. 53, §4 (AMD). PL 1977, c. 455, §2 (AMD). PL 1977, c. 510, §70 (AMD). PL 1977, c. 671, §§28,29 (AMD). PL 1987, c. 361, §4 (AMD). PL 1989, c. 693, §§2,3 (AMD). PL 1989, c. 875, §§E23,24 (AMD). PL 1991, c. 783, §1 (AMD). PL 1993, c. 511, §1 (AMD). PL 1995, c. 368, §§R2,3 (AMD). PL 1995, c. 405, §1 (AMD). PL 1995, c. 502, §§F11,12 (AMD). PL 1995, c. 680, §6 (AMD). PL 1995, c. 694, §D26 (AMD). PL 1995, c. 694, §E2 (AFF). PL 1997, c. 422, §1 (AMD). PL 1999, c. 437, §1 (AMD). PL 2001, c. 354, §3 (AMD). PL 2001, c. 439, §OOO3 (AMD). PL 2003, c. 689, §B6 (REV). PL 2003, c. 706, §A5 (AMD). PL 2005, c. 389, §2 (AMD). PL 2005, c. 488, §5 (AMD). PL 2009, c. 142, §7 (AMD). PL 2009, c. 365, Pt. A, §4 (AMD). PL 2009, c. 608, §9 (AMD). PL 2013, c. 133, §13 (AMD). PL 2013, c. 227, §§2-4 (AMD). PL 2017, c. 105, §4 (AMD). PL 2017, c. 407, Pt. A, §55 (AMD). PL 2019, c. 113, Pt. A, §1 (RP).

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 24 cases, 1976–2019 · leading case: State v. Grady, 831 S.E.2d 542 (N.C. 2019).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

State v. Grady, 831 S.E.2d 542 (N.C. 2019). · cites it 2× “4 (A) (2012); Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 17-A, § 1204(2-A)(N) (Supp.”

State v. Letalien, 2009 ME 130 (Me. 2009). · cites it 2× “680, § 6 (codified at 17-A M.R.S.A. § 1204(l-C)(Supp.1996)). [3] The waiver of registration provision established four avenues by which the registration requirement might be waived.”

State of Maine v. Douglas Annis, 2018 ME 15 (Me. 2018). · cites it 2× “Furthermore, the “no unsupervised contact” provision of Annis’s probation was well within the authority of the court pursuant to 17-A M.R.S. § 1204(2-A) (2017) and did not violate his constitutional rights.”

State v. Hudson, 470 A.2d 786 (Me. 1984). · cites it 4× “1 He also argues that the evidence required a finding that payment of restitution would create excessive financial hardship on the defendant and his dependents and was therefore not authorized under 17-A M.”

State v. Coreau, 651 A.2d 319 (Me. 1994). · cites it 3× “2 A sentencing court’s power to impose conditions of probation is governed *321 by 17-A M.R.S.A. § 1204 (1983 & Supp. 1994), which provides in pertinent part: 1.”

State v. Michaud, 590 A.2d 538 (Me. 1991). · cites it 2× “See 17-A M.R.S.A. § 1204 (1983 & Supp.1990). 18 .”

State v. Almurshidy, 1999 ME 97 (Me. 1999). · cites it 2× “See 17-A M.R.S.A. § 1204(1) (Supp.1998). The Superior Court revoked his probation, and he was ordered to serve the time remaining on his sentence.”

State v. Telford, 2010 ME 33 (Me. 2010). · cites it 4× “Instead, "[w]hen presented with a request to modify a condition of probation, the trial court must find that the requested condition would advance one of the purposes set forth in [17-A M.R.S. § 1204]." Id. at 1170-71; see 17-A M.”

State v. Hardy, 489 A.2d 508 (Me. 1985). “Although we are not convinced that any objection was preserved, because we are vacating the sentence we simply note that 17-A M.R.S.A. § 1204(3) (1983) requires that the defendant have an opportunity to be heard on the conditions of probation and to contest controverted facts at…”

State v. Nolan, 2000 ME 165 (Me. 2000). · cites it 3× “[¶ 9] A court’s power to impose conditions of probation is governed by 17-A M.R.S.A. § 1204 (1983 & Supp.1999). 2 *724 Probation is a device designed to assist individuals in reintegrating into society, and may be premised on reasonable conditions that are tailored to a…”

State v. Webb, 673 A.2d 1345 (Me. 1996). · cites it 2× “1995), to modify or add to, as limited by 17-A M.R.S.A. § 1204 (1983 & Supp.1995), the requirements of probation.”

State v. Collins, 681 A.2d 1168 (Me. 1996). · cites it 2× “17-A M.R.S.A. § 1204 (1983 & Supp.1995) states: 1.”

Show all 24 citing cases →

— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 17-A, § 1204(1) — 5 cases

State v. Almurshidy, 1999 ME 97 (Me. 1999). “See 17-A M.R.S.A. § 1204(1) (Supp.1998). The Superior Court revoked his probation, and he was ordered to serve the time remaining on his sentence.”

State v. Collins, 681 A.2d 1168 (Me. 1996). “17-A M.R.S.A. § 1204 (1983 & Supp.1995) states: 1.”

State v. Smith, 573 A.2d 384 (Me. 1990).

State v. Black, 914 A.2d 723 (Me. 2007).

State of Maine v. Binnie (Me. Super. Ct 2005).

— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 17-A, § 1204(3) — 3 cases

State v. Hardy, 489 A.2d 508 (Me. 1985). “Although we are not convinced that any objection was preserved, because we are vacating the sentence we simply note that 17-A M.R.S.A. § 1204(3) (1983) requires that the defendant have an opportunity to be heard on the conditions of probation and to contest controverted facts at…”

State v. Michaud, 590 A.2d 538 (Me. 1991). “See 17-A M.R.S.A. § 1204 (1983 & Supp.1990). 18 .”

State v. Hudson, 470 A.2d 786 (Me. 1984). “1 He also argues that the evidence required a finding that payment of restitution would create excessive financial hardship on the defendant and his dependents and was therefore not authorized under 17-A M.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.