Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 17-A, § 1301 (2026)

Amounts authorized

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(REPEALED)

SECTION HISTORY

PL 1975, c. 499, §1 (NEW). PL 1975, c. 740, §§121-123 (AMD). PL 1977, c. 510, §§83-86 (AMD). PL 1981, c. 317, §27 (AMD). PL 1985, c. 699 (AMD). PL 1989, c. 872, §§3,4 (AMD). PL 1991, c. 355, §§1,2 (AMD). PL 2001, c. 383, §152 (AMD). PL 2001, c. 383, §156 (AFF). RR 2005, c. 1, §2 (COR). PL 2005, c. 386, §DD2 (AMD). PL 2011, c. 464, §22 (AMD). PL 2019, c. 113, Pt. A, §1 (RP).

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 20 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1976–2024 · leading case: State v. Dansinger, 521 A.2d 685 (Me. 1987).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

State v. Dansinger, 521 A.2d 685 (Me. 1987). · cites it 4× “§ 1252(2)(E)), and a fine not in excess of $500 (17-A M.R.S.A. § 1301(1)(C)). Although consideration of the relative severity of the sentence is not controlling, it is clear that, on their face, the sentences in this case, fit comfortably within the lower scale of the authorized…”

Opinion of the Justices of the Supreme Jud. Court, 355 A.2d 341 (Me. 1976). · cites it 3× “17-A MRSA § 1301, sub-§ 1, 1st ¶[, as enacted by PL 1975, c.”

State of Maine v. Lyanne Lemeunier-Fitzgerald, 2018 ME 85 (Me. 2018). “§ 1252(2) (establishing the maximum period of incarceration for each class of crime); 17-A M.R.S. § 1301(1-A) (2017) (establishing the maximum fine that may be imposed for each class of crime).”

State v. Sherburne, 571 A.2d 1181 (Me. 1990). · cites it 2× “17-A M.R.S.A. § 1301 (1983). In addition, 12 M.”

State v. Fournier, 617 A.2d 998 (Me. 1992). · cites it 2× “See 17-A M.R.S.A. § 1301 (1989 & Supp.1991). [3] Common sense leads me to believe, and clinical research appears to confirm that probationers pay their restitution obligations more diligently when under the threat of probation revocation.”

State of Maine v. Anthony Lord, 2019 ME 82 (Me. 2019). “7 See 17-A M.R.S. § 1301 (2018). [¶23] Lord applied to the Sentence Review Panel seeking to appeal from his sentence, and the Panel granted his application.”

State v. Kee, 398 A.2d 384 (Me. 1979). “17-A M.R.S.A. § 1301(1) provides in part: “A natural person who has been convicted of a Class B, Class C, Class D or Class E crime may be sentenced to pay a fine, unless the statute which the person is convicted of violating expressly provides that the fine and imprisonment…”

State v. Cain, 888 A.2d 276 (Me. 2006). “2004) and 17-A M.R.S.A. § 1301 (1983 & Supp.2004), that set up the basic regime for sentencing and fines, and 29-A M.”

Olson v. Sec'y of State, 1997 ME 30 (Me. 1997). “§ 1252, and by a fine not exceeding $50,000, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 1301.”

State of Maine v. David L. Thompson, 2017 ME 13 (Me. 2017). “The court also ordered Thompson to pay the minimum mandatory fine of $400 on each of the two charges, see 17-A M.R.S. § 1301(6) (2015), 6 and imposed restitution of $2,500 for the cost of drug testing.”

State v. Harrell, 2012 ME 82 (Me. 2012). · cites it 2× “§ 1252(2)(C) (2011); and a $5000 fine, 17-A M.R.S. § 1301(1-A)(C) (2011). 4 [¶ 7] Because we vacate the portion of the sentence imposing a mandatory minimum fine, we need not address Harrell’s remaining argument.”

State of Maine v. Clifford W. Thornton, 2015 ME 15 (Me. 2015). “§ 1252(2)(B)-(C) (2014), and a fine of up to $5000 rather than up to $20,000, see 17-A M.R.S. § 1301(1-A)(B)-(C) (2014). [¶ 13] Finally, the evidence at trial reveals a rational basis on which the jury could find Thornton guilty of the lesser included Class C offense, and the…”

Show all 20 citing cases →

— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 17-A, § 1301(1) — 1 case

— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 17-A, § 1301(1)(C) — 1 case

State v. Dansinger, 521 A.2d 685 (Me. 1987). “§ 1252(2)(E)), and a fine not in excess of $500 (17-A M.R.S.A. § 1301(1)(C)). Although consideration of the relative severity of the sentence is not controlling, it is clear that, on their face, the sentences in this case, fit comfortably within the lower scale of the authorized…”

— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 17-A, § 1301(1)(E) — 1 case

Roussel v. Mayo (D. Me. 2024).

— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 17-A, § 1301(6) — 2 cases

State of Maine v. Brandon C. Hayes, 2016 ME 39 (Me. 2016).

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.