Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 21
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 21, § 1579 (2026)

Class E crimes

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1965, c. 103 (AMD). PL 1965, c. 451, §12 (AMD). PL 1967, c. 225, §23 (AMD). PL 1969, c. 72, §1 (AMD). PL 1969, c. 215, §3 (AMD). PL 1971, c. 65, §25 (AMD). PL 1973, c. 414, §§58,59 (AMD). PL 1975, c. 592 (AMD). PL 1975, c. 759, §6 (AMD). PL 1975, c. 761, §57 (AMD). PL 1977, c. 496, §38 (RPR). PL 1977, c. 500, §3 (AMD). PL 1977, c. 696, §§179,180 (AMD). PL 1981, c. 256, §3 (AMD). PL 1985, c. 161, §5 (RP).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1977–1977 · leading case: State v. King, 371 A.2d 640 (Me. 1977).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. King, 371 A.2d 640 (Me. 1977). “Prom this, we may draw one of three conclusions: that 1) the Legislature intended “ballot” to include the envelope; or 2) the Legislature intended to proscribe only the forging of names of voters on applications or envelopes (in which case the forging of actual ballots would…”
Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 21, § 1579(7): 1 case
State v. King, 371 A.2d 640 (Me. 1977). “Prom this, we may draw one of three conclusions: that 1) the Legislature intended “ballot” to include the envelope; or 2) the Legislature intended to proscribe only the forging of names of voters on applications or envelopes (in which case the forging of actual ballots would…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.