Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 22
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 22, § 2210 (2026)

Sale of barbiturates

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1965, c. 359, §2 (AMD). PL 1967, c. 390, §2 (AMD). PL 1971, c. 621, §1 (AMD). PL 1975, c. 499, §29 (RP).
The Revisor's Office cannot provide legal advice or interpretation of Maine law to the public.
If you need legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases, 1971–1977 · leading case: State v. Appleton, 297 A.2d 363 (Me. 1972).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Appleton, 297 A.2d 363 (Me. 1972). · cites it 2× “Appleton was tried before jury for the crime of unlawful possession of methamphetamine under 22 M.R.S.A. § 2210 and of unlawful possession of cannabis or marijuana under 22 M.”
State v. McCrillis, 376 A.2d 95 (Me. 1977). “In December 1975-three separate indictments were returned in the Superior Court (Somerset County) charging defendant David McCrillis with having committed the crimes, respectively, of furnishing amphetamine (22 M.R.S.A. § 2210), selling amphetamine (22 M.”
State v. Walker, 341 A.2d 700 (Me. 1975). “” And so, finally, he looked into the paper bag and found a number of small plastic bags, each of which held small white pills. When tested by the State laboratories, these pills were alleged to be Phendimetrazine, a controlled substance the possession of which by defendant was…”
State v. Boyajian, 344 A.2d 410 (Me. 1975). “” 4 As we have noted, 22 M.R.S.A. § 2210 proscribes the sale of any drug designated by the Board as a “potent medicinal substance.”
State v. Richards, 296 A.2d 129 (Me. 1972). “In the District Court (Northern Andro-scoggin Division, Livermore Falls) defendant was charged with possessing barbituric acid and amphetamines (a felony in violation of 22 M.R.S.A. § 2210). Pending a hearing on probable cause, defendant moved in the Superior Court…”
State v. Lambert, 363 A.2d 707 (Me. 1976). “Van Horn were together made the defendants in four separate indictments charging, respectively, that they possessed methamphetamine (22 M.R.S.A. § 2210), narcotics (22 M.R.S.”
State v. Girard, 283 A.2d 462 (Me. 1971). · cites it 2× “This is an appeal from a judgment based upon a jury verdict which found the Defendant guilty of selling amphetamines in violation of 22 M.R.S.A. § 2210. We summarize the facts.”
State v. Sargent, 305 A.2d 273 (Me. 1973). “In the Superior Court (Penobscot County) defendant, on May 25, 1971, pleaded guilty to the offense of selling amphetamines (in violation of 22 M.R.S.A. § 2210). Because defendant (19 years old) was between the ages of seventeen and twenty-six, Maine statutes allowed the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.