Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 22, § 2212-B (2026)

Possession of certain hallucinogenic drugs

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1967, c. 390, §5 (NEW). PL 1969, c. 443, §3 (AMD). PL 1971, c. 487, §2 (RPR). PL 1975, c. 499, §33 (RP).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1973–1976 · leading case: State v. Philpot, 365 A.2d 122 (Me. 1976).
State v. Philpot, 365 A.2d 122 (Me. 1976). · cites it 9× “3 Only two of these forms, he maintains, are proscribed by 22 M.R.S.A. § 2212-B. 4 A specific reference to D-lysergic acid diethylamide is found in the statute.”
State v. Dubay., 313 A.2d 908 (Me. 1974). · cites it 6× “This case arises from an indictment charging that defendant had committed the felony of being in possession of "LSD-25", (22 M.R.S.A. § 2212-B). With the consent of the parties who have stipulated the relevant facts, the Justice presiding in the Superior Court (Penobscot…”
State v. Allard, 313 A.2d 439 (Me. 1973). · cites it 3× “The Defendant was charged with a violation of 22 M.R.S.A. § 2212-B, 2 illegal possession of LSD.”
State v. Dubay, 338 A.2d 797 (Me. 1975). · cites it 2× “Dubay, was indicted for illegal possession of d-lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD-25) in contravention of 22 M.R.S.A. § 2212-B. Pursuant to M.R.Crim.”
State v. Willey, 363 A.2d 739 (Me. 1976). “§ 2384) and possession of hallucinogenic drugs (22 M.R.S.A. § 2212-B). On October 29, 1974 a Justice presiding in the Superior Court denied defendant’s motion to suppress, for potential use as evidence against him, particular marijuana and phenycylidine which, in execution of a…”
State v. Paris, 343 A.2d 588 (Me. 1975). · cites it 2× “On September 5, 1973 an indictment was returned against defendant in the Superior Court (York County) charging him with possession of phencyclidine in violation of 22 M.R.S.A. § 2212-B. Defendant was arraigned and entered a plea of not guilty.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.