Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 22, § 2212-E (2026)

Selling of certain hallucinogenic drugs

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1971, c. 621, §4 (NEW). PL 1975, c. 499, §35 (RP).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1975–1976 · leading case: State v. Clapp, 335 A.2d 897 (Me. 1975).
State v. Clapp, 335 A.2d 897 (Me. 1975). · cites it 2× “Virtually unanimous is the current of authority that a defendant may not be convicted of the crime of selling a narcotic drug (in violation of a statute such as 22 M.R.S.A. § 2212-E) without proof by the State that the defendant believed he was selling a substance "narcotic" in…”
State v. Philpot, 365 A.2d 122 (Me. 1976). · cites it 2× “The appellant was charged by indictment with having sold an hallucinogen in violation of 22 M.R.S.A. § 2212-E. 1 This appeal was seasonably filed after a judgment entered on a jury verdict of guilty.”
State v. Cormier, 357 A.2d 530 (Me. 1976). “Defendant adverts to the mandatory imprisonment prescribed as the punishment for selling LSD-25 (22 M.R.S.A. § 2212-E) but not for selling mescaline (22 M.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.