Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 22
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 22, § 2215 (2026)

Violations generally

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1965, c. 359, §3 (AMD). PL 1967, c. 390, §6 (AMD). PL 1971, c. 282, §13 (AMD). PL 1971, c. 621, §5 (AMD). PL 1975, c. 499, §36 (RP).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1973–1977 · leading case: State v. King, 330 A.2d 124 (Me. 1974).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. King, 330 A.2d 124 (Me. 1974). · cites it 2× “We cannot say that an obligatory prison term under 22 M.R.S.A. § 2215 lacks rational relation to a public policy of suppressing unlawful traffic in regulated drugs.”
State v. McCrillis, 376 A.2d 95 (Me. 1977). “In terms of the severity of punishment prescribed by the Legislature for these crimes, the significant differences are: (1) as to maximum punishment, a third or subsequent sale of amphetamine is punishable by more than 10 years imprisonment (22 M.R.S.A. § 2215) whereas a third…”
State v. Boisvert, 348 A.2d 7 (Me. 1975). “22 M.R.S.A. § 2215. 3 . The negative allegation in this indictment may be considered surplusage and was subject to being stricken on appropriate motion by the defendant pursuant to Rule 7(d), M.”
State v. Sargent, 305 A.2d 273 (Me. 1973). “Because defendant (19 years old) was between the ages of seventeen and twenty-six, Maine statutes allowed the presiding Justice the sentencing options (for incarceration) to commit defendant (1) to the Maine State Prison (or to a jail) for a definite term within a maximum of two…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.