Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 28-A, § 754 (2026)

Records open for inspection

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
1.  Records open for inspection.  All records required to be kept under this chapter are open for inspection to the bureau or its representatives at any time. The bureau or its representatives may make copies of records that may be used as evidence of violation of this chapter.  
[PL 2013, c. 588, Pt. B, §4 (AMD).]
2.  Refusal of access.  A licensee may not refuse to allow the bureau or its representatives to audit the books and records of the licensee.  
[PL 2013, c. 588, Pt. B, §4 (AMD).]
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1987, c. 45, §A4 (NEW). PL 1997, c. 373, §72 (AMD). PL 2013, c. 588, Pt. B, §4 (AMD).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2009–2009 · leading case: State v. Johnson, 2009 ME 6, 962 A.2d 973.
State v. Johnson, 2009 ME 6, 962 A.2d 973. · cites it 2× “are open for inspection to the alcohol bureau, its representatives or representatives of the [Liquor Inspections Unit] at any time,” 28-A M.R.S. § 754(1) (2008), and “[a] licensee may not refuse to allow the alcohol bureau, its representatives or representatives of the [Liquor…”
Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 28-A, § 754(1): 1 case
State v. Johnson, 2009 ME 6, 962 A.2d 973. “are open for inspection to the alcohol bureau, its representatives or representatives of the [Liquor Inspections Unit] at any time,” 28-A M.R.S. § 754(1) (2008), and “[a] licensee may not refuse to allow the alcohol bureau, its representatives or representatives of the [Liquor…”
Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 28-A, § 754(2): 1 case
State v. Johnson, 2009 ME 6, 962 A.2d 973. “are open for inspection to the alcohol bureau, its representatives or representatives of the [Liquor Inspections Unit] at any time,” 28-A M.R.S. § 754(1) (2008), and “[a] licensee may not refuse to allow the alcohol bureau, its representatives or representatives of the [Liquor…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.