Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 29, § 2242 (2026)

Appeals

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1977, c. 694, §527 (RPR). PL 1993, c. 683, §A1 (RP). PL 1993, c. 683, §B5 (AFF).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1972–1990 · leading case: Maines v. Sec'y of State, 493 A.2d 326 (Me. 1985).
Maines v. Sec'y of State, 493 A.2d 326 (Me. 1985). · cites it 2× “Neither Guthrie nor Maines requested a post-suspension administrative hearing nor sought direct review in Superi- or Court pursuant to 29 M.R.S.A. § 2242 (Supp.1984). Instead, on October 6, 1983, *327 they filed this class action in Superior Court asserting the facial…”
Papapetrou v. Edgar, 290 A.2d 202 (Me. 1972). · cites it 5× “e, 29 M.R.S.A. § 2242. Said section 2242 deals with the authority of the Secretary of State to suspend or revoke licenses to operate motor vehicles, generally, as well as with the judicial review of decisions made by the Secretary of State in the exercise of such authority.”
Small v. Gartley, 363 A.2d 724 (Me. 1976). · cites it 2× “The same cautious and careful approach followed by the Law Court in dealing with the question of the validity of statutes on issues of constitutionality must guide the Superior Court in its treatment of such constitutional questions raised in reviews of administrative action…”
Koren v. Sec'y of State, 574 A.2d 895 (Me. 1990). “Koren appealed to the Superior Court pursuant to 29 M.R.S.A. § 2242 (Supp.1989) and M.R.Civ.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.