Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 29
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 29, § 2302 (2026)

Jurisdiction

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1973, c. 625, §192 (AMD). PL 1975, c. 430, §55 (AMD). PL 1975, c. 623, §§44-D (AMD). PL 1981, c. 679, §59 (AMD). PL 1985, c. 812, §B7 (AMD). PL 1993, c. 683, §A1 (RP). PL 1993, c. 683, §B5 (AFF).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1980–1983 · leading case: State v. Anton, 463 A.2d 703 (Me. 1983).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Anton, 463 A.2d 703 (Me. 1983). · cites it 3× “29 M.R.S.A. § 2302 (Supp.1982). The Supreme Judicial Court adopted special procedures in the District Court Civil Rules designed to simplify traffic infraction proceedings.”
Inhabitants of Town of Boothbay v. Russell, 410 A.2d 554 (Me. 1980). “There is nothing in the applicable statutes relative to civil violations comparable to 29 M.R.S.A. § 2302 (1978), which gives the District Court exclusive jurisdiction over traffic infractions.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.