Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 29
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 29, § 2367 (2026)

Information on certificate

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1973, c. 586, §1 (NEW). PL 1975, c. 745, §19 (AMD). PL 1981, c. 110, §§19-21 (AMD). PL 1985, c. 401, §18 (AMD). PL 1993, c. 297, §A34 (AMD). PL 1993, c. 297, §A39 (AFF). PL 1993, c. 683, §A1 (RP). PL 1993, c. 683, §B5 (AFF).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1995–1995 · leading case: O'Donnell v. Chertok (In re Cork & Bagel Trading Co.), 192 B.R. 789 (Bankr. D. Me. 1995).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
O'Donnell v. Chertok (In re Cork & Bagel Trading Co.), 192 B.R. 789 (Bankr. D. Me. 1995). · cites it 2× “The Court finds that under the definition of owner, both Debtor and Defendant qualify as owners of the vehicle.”
Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 29, § 2367(1)(B): 1 case
O'Donnell v. Chertok (In re Cork & Bagel Trading Co.), 192 B.R. 789 (Bankr. D. Me. 1995). “The Court finds that under the definition of owner, both Debtor and Defendant qualify as owners of the vehicle.”
Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 29, § 2367(4): 1 case
O'Donnell v. Chertok (In re Cork & Bagel Trading Co.), 192 B.R. 789 (Bankr. D. Me. 1995). “The Court finds that under the definition of owner, both Debtor and Defendant qualify as owners of the vehicle.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.